Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 243.16 (2026)

[Repealed]

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

MS 2004 [Repealed, 2002 c 268 s 7]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases, 1962–1999 · leading case: State v. Murphy, 545 N.W.2d 909 (Minn. 1996).
State v. Murphy, 545 N.W.2d 909 (Minn. 1996). · cites it 6× “” Minn.Stat. § 243.16. subd. 2(1)(a) (1994); see also State ex rel.”
State v. Manning, 532 N.W.2d 244 (Minn. Ct. App. 1995). · cites it 2× “When the state accepts a prisoner from another state under a reciprocal agreement under the interstate compact authorized by section 243.16, the acceptance is conditional on the offender agreeing to register under this section when the offender is living in Minnesota following a…”
State v. Burr, 598 N.W.2d 147 (N.D. 1999). “732; Minn.Stat. Ann. § 243.16; Miss.Code Ann. §§ 45-33-1 to 45-33-19; Mo.”
State Ex Rel. Morris v. Tahash, 115 N.W.2d 676 (Minn. 1962). · cites it 3× “Section 243.16 authorizes Minnesota to enter into reciprocal agreements with other states covering out-of-state probationers which agreements provide for their return without extradition proceedings for probation violation.”
Pehler v. Schoen, 537 F.2d 970 (8th Cir. 1976). · cites it 3× “See Minn.Stat.Ann. § 243.16. On June 7, 1973, while in Minnesota and on such parole, Pehler was convicted on a state charge of unauthorized use of a motor vehicle and was incarcerated in the Minnesota State Prison at Stillwater under a three-year sentence.”
Gullickson v. Torkelson Bros., Inc., 1999 ND 155 (N.D. 1999). “732; Minn. Stat. Ann. § 243.16 ; Miss. Code Ann.”
Minn. Stat. § 243.16(4)(e): 1 case
Pehler v. Schoen, 537 F.2d 970 (8th Cir. 1976). “See Minn.Stat.Ann. § 243.16. On June 7, 1973, while in Minnesota and on such parole, Pehler was convicted on a state charge of unauthorized use of a motor vehicle and was incarcerated in the Minnesota State Prison at Stillwater under a three-year sentence.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.