Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 253D.35 (2026)

Aftercare Services

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Subdivision 1.Provision.

The Minnesota Sex Offender Program shall provide the supervision, aftercare, and case management services for a person under commitment as a sexually dangerous person or a person with a sexual psychopathic personality. The designated agency, as defined in section 253B.02, subdivision 5, shall assist with eligibility for public welfare benefits and will provide those services that are available exclusively through county government.

Subd. 2.Plan.

Prior to the date of discharge or provisional discharge of any person committed as a sexually dangerous person or a person with a sexual psychopathic personality, the executive director shall establish a continuing plan of aftercare services for the committed person, including a plan for medical and behavioral health services, financial sustainability, housing, social supports, or other assistance the committed person needs. The Minnesota Sex Offender Program shall provide case management services and shall assist the committed person in finding employment, suitable shelter, and adequate medical and behavioral health services and otherwise assist in the committed person's readjustment to the community.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 2014–2017 · leading case: Karsjens v. Jesson, 6 F. Supp. 3d 958 (D. Minnesota 2014).
Karsjens v. Jesson, 6 F. Supp. 3d 958 (D. Minnesota 2014). · cites it 8× “Pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 253D.35 (Doc. No. [526]) is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; 3.”
In re the Civil Commitment of Kropp, 895 N.W.2d 647 (Minn. Ct. App. 2017). · cites it 2× “The panel denied the motion to dismiss and ordered the executive director of MSOP to develop a provisional-discharge plan in conjunction with Kropp as required by Minn. Stat. § 253D.35, subd. 2 (2016). The order provided that the plan must be filed within 30 days.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.