Minnesota Statutes
Minn. Stat. § 256.87 (2026)
[Repealed]
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
[Renumbered 518A.82]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 44
cases, 1984–2014 · leading case: State Ex Rel. Region VIII North Welfare Ex Rel. Evans v. Evans, 402 N.W.2d 158 (Minn. Ct. App. 1987).
State Ex Rel. Region VIII North Welfare Ex Rel. Evans v. Evans, 402 N.W.2d 158 (Minn. Ct. App. 1987). “Appellant County brought this action under Minn.Stat. § 256.87, subd. 1 (1984) to recoup from respondent welfare payments made to Shirley Evans.”
Cnty. of Nicollet v. Larson, 421 N.W.2d 717 (Minn. 1988). “We agree that it is within the trial court’s discretion “to order reimbursement and how much reimbursement to order. Reimbursement is governed by two standards: 1) the parent’s ability to pay, and 2) the amount of assistance furnished to and for the benefit of the child.”
Cnty. of Anoka v. Richards, 345 N.W.2d 263 (Minn. Ct. App. 1984). “This is an appeal from an order of the Anoka County District Court that resulted from an action commenced by the County on April 28, 1983, pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 256.87, subd. 1, to recover money from a parent of a child receiving public assistance.”
Anderson v. Anderson, 470 N.W.2d 719 (Minn. Ct. App. 1991). “The county argues the ALJ erred in ruling that the reservation of child support in the dissolution decree precluded reimbursement for past assistance furnished under Minn.Stat. § 256.87, subd. 1 (1990). We reverse and remand.”
Cnty. of Isanti v. Formhals, 358 N.W.2d 703 (Minn. Ct. App. 1984). “This action was commenced pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 256.87, subd. 1, to recover money from a parent of a child receiving public assistance.”
Schaefer v. Weber, 567 N.W.2d 29 (Minn. 1997). “However, the ALJ held that under Minn.Stat. § 256.87 (1996), Weber’s liability for past AFDC payments was limited to the two years prior to the 1995 motion, rather than two years prior to the 1991 complaint.”
State, Cnty. of Clay Ex Rel. Hendrickson v. Hendrickson, 403 N.W.2d 872 (Minn. Ct. App. 1987). “At that time the county moved for past and ongoing reimbursement from appellant Joseph Hendrickson for AFDC payments expended to Kisa Hendrickson for the benefit of their two children.”
Wilson v. Speer, 499 N.W.2d 850 (Minn. Ct. App. 1993). “Where there has been no formal adjudication of paternity, may the court order guideline child support from a man presumed the father of a child under Minn. Stat. § 257.55 , subd. 1(e) (1990), where the presumption arises from a signed declaration of parentage? 2.”
Hennepin Cnty. v. Geshick, 387 N.W.2d 439 (Minn. Ct. App. 1986). “to continue “so long as petitioner receives public assistance for said child.” The county sought reconsideration of this order.”
Marriage of Davis v. Davis, 631 N.W.2d 822 (Minn. Ct. App. 2001). “In her brief, mother characterized this action as an action for reimbursement of public assistance brought pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 256.87 (2000) and argued that the district court abused its discretion in failing to determine that the children were entitled to MinnesotaCare…”
State Ex Rel. Miller v. Miller, 446 N.W.2d 199 (Minn. Ct. App. 1989). “Beltrami County appeals from a judgment in an action it commenced pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 256.87 for ongoing reimbursement of public assistance.”
Ver Kuilen v. Ver Kuilen, 578 N.W.2d 790 (Minn. Ct. App. 1998). “We will not reverse the judge’s decision under Minn.Stat. § 256.87 (1996 & Supp.1997) absent an abuse of discretion.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.