Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 256D.065 (2026)

[Repealed]

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

[Repealed, 1997 c 85 art 3 s 56]

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 2 cases, 1992–1993 · leading case: Mitchell v. Steffen, 504 N.W.2d 198 (Minn. 1993).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Mitchell v. Steffen, 504 N.W.2d 198 (Minn. 1993). · cites it 48× “Both the trial court and the court of appeals ruled that Minn.Stat. § 256D.065 (1992), which imposes a durational residency requirement for full general assistance-work readiness benefits, was *199 unconstitutional.”

Mitchell v. Steffen, 487 N.W.2d 896 (Minn. Ct. App. 1992). · cites it 10× “Respondents’ suit challenges the constitutionality of Minn.Stat. § 256D.065 (Supp.1991), on the grounds that it implicates the right to travel and violates the Equal Protection Clause of the United States Constitution.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.