Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 256G.07 (2026)

Moving To Another County

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Subdivision 1.Effect of moving.

Except as provided in subdivision 4, a person who has applied for and is receiving services or assistance under a program governed by this chapter, in any county in this state, and who moves to another county in this state, is entitled to continue to receive that service from the county from which that person has moved until that person has resided in nonexcluded status for two full calendar months in the county to which that person has moved.

Subd. 2.Transfer of records.

Before the person has resided in nonexcluded status for two calendar months in the county to which that person has moved, the local agency of the county from which the person has moved shall complete an eligibility review and transfer all necessary records relating to that person to the local agency of the county to which the person has moved.

Subd. 3.Continuation of case.

When the case is terminated for 30 days or less before the recipient reapplies, that case remains the financial responsibility of the county from which the recipient moved until the residence requirement in subdivision 1 is met.

Subd. 3a.

[Repealed, 1996 c 451 art 2 s 61]

Subd. 4.Social service provision.

The types and level of social services to be provided in any case governed by this chapter are those otherwise provided in the county in which the person is physically residing at the time those services are provided.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 4 cases, 1992–2003 · leading case: In Re the Fin. Responsibility for the Mental Health Servs. Provided to D.F., 656 N.W.2d 576 (Minn. Ct. App. 2003).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

In Re the Fin. Responsibility for the Mental Health Servs. Provided to D.F., 656 N.W.2d 576 (Minn. Ct. App. 2003). · cites it 14× “Rather, we look to Minn. Stat. § 256G.07 (2002). Minn.Stat. § 256G.”

In Re Fin. Responsibility for Chem. Dependency Treatment Servs. Provided to Bratsch, 587 N.W.2d 656 (Minn. Ct. App. 1999). · cites it 13× “Minn.Stat. § 256G.07, subd. 1. After residing in the second county for two months in “nonexcluded status,” payment of benefits transfers to the second county.”

Cass Cnty. v. Wright Cnty., 493 N.W.2d 286 (Minn. Ct. App. 1992). · cites it 8× “lived in Cass County for two months in order to change the county of financial responsibility from Crow Wing County, citing Minn.Stat. § 256G.07, subd. 1. We agree with the dissent that the record does not establish that T.”

In Re the Fin. Responsibility of Foster Care Servs. Provided to T.W., 627 N.W.2d 102 (Minn. Ct. App. 2001). · cites it 6× “” Brown County argues it is not the financially responsible county because Minn. Stat. § 256G.07, subd. 1 (2000) is controlling.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.