Minn. Stat. » CHAPTER 260. JUVENILE COURT; CHILD PLACEMENT; COMPACTS
Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 260.171 (2026)

[Repealed]

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

[Repealed, 1999 c 139 art 4 s 3]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8 cases, 1973–1995 · leading case: Reno v. Flores, 507 U.S. 292 (1993).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Reno v. Flores, 507 U.S. 292 (1993). · cites it 2× “Laws § 119:67 (1969) (release to "parent, guardian or any other reputable person"); Minn. Stat. § 260.171 (1992) (release to "parent, guardian, custodian, or other suitable person"); Miss.”
Schall v. Martin, 467 U.S. 253 (1984). · cites it 2× “15 (1979); Minn. Stat. § 260.171 (1982); Miss. Code Ann.”
In Re Scott Cnty. Master Docket, 618 F. Supp. 1534 (D. Minnesota 1985). · cites it 2× “See Minn.Stat. § 260.171, subd. 2, Minn.R.Juv.”
Stefano v. Comm'r of Pub. Saf., 358 N.W.2d 83 (Minn. Ct. App. 1984). · cites it 4× “Minn.Stat. § 260.171, subd. 1 (1982). However, the parents’ presence is not required by Section 260.”
In Re the Welfare of M.E.P., 523 N.W.2d 913 (Minn. Ct. App. 1994). · cites it 4× “Minn.Stat. § 260.171, subd. 2(c) (1992). The trial court apparently concluded that the adult holding cells in which A.”
People Ex Rel. Guggenheim v. Mucci, 298 N.E.2d 109 (NY 1973). “And, indeed, at least one Family Court Judge in this State viewed the statute in this way, even to the availability of reliable hearsay evidence on the ‘ ‘ good cause ” or “ probable cause ’ ’ issue (Matter of Edwin R.”
In Re the Welfare of S.N.T.R., 403 N.W.2d 293 (Minn. Ct. App. 1987). · cites it 6× “04 and Minn.Stat. § 260.171, subd. 2 (1984) (right to a hearing within 72 hours to determine if probable cause justifies separation); Minn.”
Matter of Welfare of SAC, 529 N.W.2d 517 (Minn. Ct. App. 1995). · cites it 2× “See Minn.Stat. § 260.171, subd. 2 (referring to a "delinquent act as defined in section 260.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.