Minn. Stat. » CHAPTER 260B. DELINQUENCY
Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 260B.199 (2026)

Placement Of Juvenile Offenders At Minnesota Correctional Facility-Red Wing

✓ text as last checked Sept. 2026 (this copy records no edition or section history)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Subdivision 1.Admissions criteria.

The admissions criteria for the Minnesota Correctional Facility-Red Wing shall include a requirement that the county of referral must have considered all appropriate local or regional placements and have exhausted potential in-state placements in the geographic region. The court must state on the record that this effort was made and placements rejected before ordering a placement or commitment to the Minnesota Correctional Facility-Red Wing. Before a court orders a disposition under section 260B.198 or 260B.130, subdivision 4, for a child, the court shall determine whether the child meets the established admissions criteria for the Minnesota Correctional Facility-Red Wing. If the child meets the admissions criteria, the court shall place the child at the facility and may not place the child in an out-of-state facility, unless the court makes a finding on the record that the safety of the child or the safety of the community can be best met by placement in an out-of-state facility or that the out-of-state facility is located closer to the child's home.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 2014–2016 · leading case: In the Matter of the Welfare of: A. R. M., Child., No. A13-2352 (Minn. Ct. App. July 14, 2014).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
In the Matter of the Welfare of: A. R. M., Child., No. A13-2352 (Minn. Ct. App. July 14, 2014). · cites it 8× “argues that, in placing him at MCF-Red Wing, the district court violated Minn. Stat. § 260B.199, subd. 1 (2012). Before placing a juvenile at MCF-Red Wing, “the county of referral must have considered all appropriate local or regional placements and have exhausted potential…”
In the Matter of the Welfare of: B. T. B., Child., No. A15-1638 (Minn. Ct. App. Aug. 15, 2016). · cites it 2× “Minn. Stat. § 260B.199, subd. 1 (2014). This court applies an abuse-of-discretion standard of review to a district court’s dispositional order.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.