Minnesota Statutes
Minn. Stat. § 261.01 (2026)
[Repealed]
✓ text as last checked Sept. 2026 (this copy records no edition or section history)
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
[Repealed, 1973 c 650 art 21 s 33; 1974 c 355 s 72]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6
cases, 1943–1976 · leading case: Fussner v. Andert, 113 N.W.2d 355 (Minn. 1961).
Fussner v. Andert, 113 N.W.2d 355 (Minn. 1961). “Section 261.01 provides: "Every poor person who for any reason is unable to earn a livelihood shall be supported by his children, parents, brothers, and sisters, grandchildren or grandparents; and relatives having sufficient ability shall be called on for such support in the…”
McKee v. Cnty. of Ramsey, 245 N.W.2d 460 (Minn. 1976). “” A further limitation is found at the beginning of the section to the effect that the ground for appeal to the district court was that the commissioner’s decision was not “in conformity” with §§ 261.01 to 261.12. Chapter 261 dealt generally with the responsibility of counties…”
In re Application of Cnty. of Beltrami to Determine Settlement of Joyce, 119 N.W.2d 25 (Minn. 1963). “4 Briefs amicus curiae in support of Hennepin County’s position were filed by the Association on American Indian Affairs, Inc.”
Lucht v. Bell, 8 N.W.2d 26 (Minn. 1943). “1941, § 261.01 (Mason St. 1927, § 3157), in warning the Luchts to depart as persons likely to become public charges, and the sheriff threatened to remove them to their place of settlement in virtue of provisions of that statute requiring him to do so.”
Moore v. Palen, 36 N.W.2d 540 (Minn. 1949). “See, Annotations, L. R. A. 1916E, 118, 122; Duzan v. Myers, 30 Ind.”
Cnty. of Goodhue v. Rice Cnty., 160 N.W.2d 657 (Minn. 1968). “01 now provides: “Every poor person who for any reason is unable to earn a livelihood shall be supported by his children, parents, brothers, and sisters, grandchildren or grandparents; and relatives having sufficient ability shall be called on for such support in the order above…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.