Minnesota Statutes
Minn. Stat. § 261.07 (2026)
[Repealed]
✓ text as last checked Sept. 2026 (this copy records no edition or section history)
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
[Repealed, 1973 c 650 art 21 s 33; 1974 c 355 s 72]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 14
cases, 1943–1979 · leading case: In Re Application of Cnty. of Beltrami to Determine Settlement of Joyce, 119 N.W.2d 25 (Minn. 1963).
In Re Application of Cnty. of Beltrami to Determine Settlement of Joyce, 119 N.W.2d 25 (Minn. 1963). “5 Under our statutes it appears to have been intended that the responsibility for furnishing this type of public charity, commonly called poor relief, shall rest initially upon the political subdivision in which the pauper lives and applies for assistance 6 and, ultimately, upon…”
Cnty. of Ramsey v. Twp. of Lake Henry, 47 N.W.2d 554 (Minn. 1951). “In the City of Minneapolis case, this court considered the application of the provisions of § 261.07 to a case involving the determination of a poor settlement between two municipalities located in the same town-system county.”
Cnty. of Becker v. Cnty. of Hennepin, 99 N.W.2d 444 (Minn. 1959). “If it is determined that the child has been emancipated and has thenceforth retained a derivative settlement in his own right (§ 261.07, subd. 3) in Hobart Township of Otter Tail County, it will be unnecessary to consider whether the evidence sustains a finding of an ambulatory…”
Cnty. of Ramsey v. Cnty. of Sherburne, 281 N.W.2d 888 (Minn. 1979). “1971, § 261.07, a statute containing a specific and detailed subdivision dealing with the legal settlement of minors, including the general rule that the legal settlement of parents determines the legal settlement of an unemancipated minor.”
City of Minneapolis v. Vill. of Brooklyn Ctr., 27 N.W.2d 563 (Minn. 1947). “1945, § 261.07. We have been furnished with an engrossed copy of that section as amended by the legislature in 1939.”
In Re Fiihr, 184 N.W.2d 22 (Minn. 1971). “Louis County, is a public institution under § 261.07, [1] so that all of the time LaDean spent in St.”
Cnty. of St. Louis v. Cnty. of Scott, 184 N.W.2d 22 (Minn. 1971). “Louis County, is a public institution under § 261.07, 1 so that all of the time LaDean spent in St.”
In Re Determining Settlement for Poor-Relief Purposes of Sonnenberg, 256 Minn. 571 (1959). “If it is determined that the child has been emancipated and has thenceforth retained a derivative settlement in his own right (§ 261.07, subd. 3) in Hobart Township of Otter Tail County, it will be unnecessary to consider whether the evidence sustains a finding of an ambulatory…”
City of Minneapolis v. Cnty. of St. Louis, 16 N.W.2d 902 (Minn. 1944). “1941, § 261.07 (Mason St. 1940 Supp. § 3161). Appellant does not urge that the amendment is retroactive so as to cover the situation here prior to its passage, but asserts that it merely clarified the law in effect prior thereto, and that accordingly, both prior and subsequent…”
Cnty. of Goodhue v. Rice Cnty., 160 N.W.2d 657 (Minn. 1968). “08, to have it determined that Rice County, the present county of Theron Freeman’s residence, was the legal settlement of subject paupers under the provision of § 261.07. 3 The district court held that Goodhue County was itself the legal settlement.”
City of Minneapolis v. Twp. of Whitefield, 10 N.W.2d 365 (Minn. 1943). “1941, § 261.07 (Mason St. 1940 Supp. § 3161), expressly provides the conditions under which a settlement may be lost or terminated, viz.”
City of Litchfield v. Twp. of Paynesville, 103 N.W.2d 402 (Minn. 1960). “Section 261.07, subds. 1 and 5, provide: Subd.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.