Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 270.07 (2026)

[Repealed]

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

MS 2004 [Repealed, 2005 c 151 art 1 s 117]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9 cases, 1945–2018 · leading case: Fridlund Sec. Co. v. Minnesota Comm'r of Revenue, 430 N.W.2d 154 (Minn. 1988).
Fridlund Sec. Co. v. Minnesota Comm'r of Revenue, 430 N.W.2d 154 (Minn. 1988). · cites it 15× “Both taxpayer and commissioner state that the proper standard to use in reviewing penalty abatements is Minn.Stat. § 270.07, subd. 1 (1986), which provides: “The commissioner may by written order abate, reduce, or refund any penalty or interest imposed by any law relating to…”
Stelzner v. Comm'r of Revenue, 621 N.W.2d 736 (Minn. 2001). · cites it 4× “” Minn.Stat. § 270.07, subd. 1(e) (2000). The tax court affirmed the commissioner’s determination of penalties and interest.”
Ramirez v. Minnesota Dep't of Revenue (In Re Ramirez), 266 B.R. 441 (Bankr. D. Minn. 2001). · cites it 11× “The MDR’s statutory authority to setoff refunds against existing tax liabilities derives from Minn. Stat. § 270.07 , subd. 5 (1999). 1 Under this statute, “notwithstanding any other provision of law to the contrary,” the MDR may credit- the amount of an overpayment of tax…”
City of Springfield v. Comm'r of Revenue, 380 N.W.2d 802 (Minn. 1986). · cites it 8× “On April 16, 1983, the City of Springfield, pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 270.07, subd. 1 (1982), submitted an application for the abatement of property taxes assessed on the clinic for the year 1982.”
Programmed Land, Inc. v. O'CONNOR, 633 N.W.2d 517 (Minn. 2001). · cites it 4× “Minn.Stat. § 270.07, subd. 1 (2000). Due process does not require any particular form of process as long as it provides notice and a meaningful opportunity to be heard.”
Phone Recovery Servs., LLC v. Qwest Corp., 919 N.W.2d 315 (Minn. 2018). · cites it 2× “In support of this argument, Phone Recovery Services cites to Minn. Stat. § 270.07 (e) (2004), which described the authority of the Commissioner of Revenue to abate a penalty or interest assessment "imposed by any law relating to taxation.”
Klein Bancorporation, Inc. v. Comm'r of Revenue, 581 N.W.2d 863 (Minn. Ct. App. 1998). · cites it 2× “If money has been erroneously collected from a taxpayer or other person, the commissioner shall, within the period named in section 289A.”
Minnesota Power & L. Co. v. Pers. Prop. Tax, Etc., 182 N.W.2d 685 (Minn. 1970). “Nor did the commissioner avail himself of the alternative of seeking an attorney general’s opinion, which he might do under § 270.07, subd. 1. That provision, so far as material, reads: “* * * The commissioner may refer any question that may arise in reference to the true…”
Fairmont Cmty. Hosp. Assn. Inc. v. State, 21 N.W.2d 243 (Minn. 1945). · cites it 2× “Said proceedings were brought pursuant to § 270.07 (§ 1983), which provides: “The commissioner of taxation * * * shall have power to grant such reduction or abatement of assessed valuations or taxes * * * as he may deem just and equitable, * * *.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.