Minn. Stat. » CHAPTER 29. POULTRY, EGGS
Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 29.11 (2026)

[Repealed]

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

[Repealed, 1949 c 211 s 11]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1970–1989 · leading case: St. Paul Area Chamber of Com. v. Minnesota Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 251 N.W.2d 350 (Minn. 1977).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
St. Paul Area Chamber of Com. v. Minnesota Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 251 N.W.2d 350 (Minn. 1977). · cites it 3× “4 Davis, Administrative Law Treatise, § 29.11. As Professor Davis points out in chapter 29 of his comprehensive treatment of this subject matter, substantial evidence is more than ‘a scintilla’ and is ‘such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to…”
Minneapolis Van & Warehouse Co. v. St. Paul Terminal Warehouse Co., 180 N.W.2d 175 (Minn. 1970). · cites it 3× “As Professor Davis points out in chapter 29 of his comprehensive treatment of this subject matter, substantial evidence is more than “a scintilla” and is “such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion.” § 29.02. The main inquiry by…”
Contested Cases of St. Otto's Home v. Minnesota Dep't of Human Servs., 437 N.W.2d 35 (Minn. 1989). “Law Treatise § 29.11 at 375 (2d ed. 1984). After a detailed examination of both lines of Supreme Court cases.”
Minnesota State Coll. Bd. v. Pub. Emp. Relations Bd., 228 N.W.2d 551 (Minn. 1975). · cites it 2× “While the test is ‘vague, rather than precise’ and the ‘intensity of review’ may vary from case to case, § 29.11, the ‘test is the same as the test on review of a jury verdict, but the review is narrower than the review of the findings of a judge sitting without a jury,’ § 29.”
Minn. St. Coll. Bd. v. Pub. Emp. Rel. Bd., 228 N.W.2d 551 (Minn. 1975). · cites it 2× “While the test is `vague, rather than precise' and the `intensity of review' may vary from case to case, § 29.11, the `test is the same as the test on review of a jury verdict, but the review is narrower than the review of the findings of a judge sitting without a jury,' § 29.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.