Minnesota Statutes
Minn. Stat. § 3.03 (2026)
[Repealed]
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
[Repealed, 1961 c 561 s 17]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8
cases, 1980–2013 · leading case: Mastr Asset Backed Sec. Trust 2006-He3 ex rel. U.S. Bank Nat'l Ass'n v. WMC Mortg. Corp., 843 F. Supp. 2d 996 (D. Minnesota 2012).
Mastr Asset Backed Sec. Trust 2006-He3 ex rel. U.S. Bank Nat'l Ass'n v. WMC Mortg. Corp., 843 F. Supp. 2d 996 (D. Minnesota 2012). “(EquiFirst’s Purchase Agreement § 3.03 (Docket No. 26-1 at 43).) WMC’s contract, by contrast, requires only “prompt notice.”
Mastr Asset Backed Sec. Trust 2006-He3 ex rel. U.S. Bank Nat'l Ass'n v. WMC Mortg., LLC, 983 F. Supp. 2d 1104 (D. Minnesota 2013). “(EquiFirst Purchase Agreement § 3.03.) The WMC Purchase Agreement required the party discovering an alleged breach of representations and warranties to give “prompt notice” of the breach but did not specify a number of days.”
Surgidev Corp. v. Eye Tech., Inc., 648 F. Supp. 661 (D. Minnesota 1986). “Generally, plaintiff may establish the requisite “legal relationship” by proof of an express contractual agreement or agreements between it and the defendants or by proof of a confidential relationship giving rise to a duty not to disclose.”
Elsenpeter v. St. Michael Mall, Inc., 794 N.W.2d 667 (Minn. Ct. App. 2011). “The mall argues that it is entitled to the requested attorney fees pursuant to section 3.03 of the lease, which provides: “Tenant shall indemnify Landlord from and hold Landlord harmless against any and all liabilities, damages, losses, liens, mechanic’s liens, foreclosures,…”
Dykhoff v. Xcel Energy, 840 N.W.2d 821 (Minn. 2013). “§ 3.03. Jurisdictions applying the increased risk doctrine differ as to whether the employee must show that the risk is unique to the employment.”
Barker v. Ceridian Corp., 918 F. Supp. 1298 (D. Minnesota 1996). “29; see also Dental Assistance Plan, Article III, § 3.03(c), pg. 8, attached to the affidavit of Ann M.”
Tatter v. Bd. of Educ. of Indep. Sch. Dist. No. 306, 490 F. Supp. 494 (D. Minnesota 1980). “Digest 2d Contracts §§ 3.03, 3.04 (3d ed. 1977), and that an acceptance must be made in definite and unequivocal terms.”
United States v. Agosto, 557 F. Supp. 454 (D. Minnesota 1983). “, 1968 House Report, supra; Magistrate’s Manual, supra, § 3.03. This authority is limited even further in felony cases.”
— Minn. Stat. § 3.03(c) — 1 case
Barker v. Ceridian Corp., 918 F. Supp. 1298 (D. Minnesota 1996). “29; see also Dental Assistance Plan, Article III, § 3.03(c), pg. 8, attached to the affidavit of Ann M.”
— Minn. Stat. § 3.03(d) — 1 case
Barker v. Ceridian Corp., 918 F. Supp. 1298 (D. Minnesota 1996). “29; see also Dental Assistance Plan, Article III, § 3.03(c), pg. 8, attached to the affidavit of Ann M.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.