Minn. Stat. » CHAPTER 300. GENERAL PROVISIONS
Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 300.29 (2026)

[Repealed]

✓ text as last checked Sept. 2026 (this copy records no edition or section history)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

[Repealed, 2005 c 69 art 4 s 1]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 2009–2010 · leading case: KRUMMENACHER v. City of Minnetonka, 783 N.W.2d 721 (Minn. 2010).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
KRUMMENACHER v. City of Minnetonka, 783 N.W.2d 721 (Minn. 2010). · cites it 3× “See Minnetonka City Code § 300.29(g)(1). This ordinance provides that “an expansion of any non-conforming use may not be done without first obtaining a variance.”
Krummenacher v. City of Minnetonka, 768 N.W.2d 377 (Minn. Ct. App. 2009). “Code of Ordinances § 300.29 governs nonconforming uses. Section 300.”
Minn. Stat. § 300.29(g)(1): 1 case
KRUMMENACHER v. City of Minnetonka, 783 N.W.2d 721 (Minn. 2010). “See Minnetonka City Code § 300.29(g)(1). This ordinance provides that “an expansion of any non-conforming use may not be done without first obtaining a variance.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.