Minn. Stat. » CHAPTER 322B. LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANIES
Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 322B.833 (2026)

[Repealed]

✓ text as last checked Sept. 2026 (this copy records no edition or section history)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

MS 2016 [Repealed, 2014 c 157 art 1 s 91]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2007–2022 · leading case: Lund v. Lund, 924 N.W.2d 274 (Minn. Ct. App. 2019).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Lund v. Lund, 924 N.W.2d 274 (Minn. Ct. App. 2019). · cites it 6× “751 and Minn. Stat. § 322B.833, 4 and appellants moved for summary judgment.”
Mahoney & Hagberg v. Newgard, 729 N.W.2d 302 (Minn. 2007). · cites it 2× “First, Boldt alleges that “Burns and Miller, aided by Mahoney, prepared and signed revised corporate records for PAL that purport to exclude Boldt as an owner of PAL and give 100% of PAL to Burns and Miller.”
Robert Kagel v. Christian Brackey, No. A15-934 (Minn. Ct. App. Jan. 25, 2016). · cites it 36× “In July 2012, Kagel moved to force a buyout of Brackey’s membership interest in KAC under Minn. Stat. § 322B.833 (2014) or, alternatively, Minn.”
D.Y.N. Kiev, LLC v. Jackson, 802 N.W.2d 821 (Minn. Ct. App. 2011). · cites it 6× “The parties stipulated that they are deadlocked in the management of the affairs of the companies and that the companies should be dissolved pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 322B.833, subd. 1 (2010). The district court conducted a bench trial in July 2010 and, on October 22, 2010,…”
Timothy E. Lewis v. Paul J. Borchert, No. A14-379 (Minn. Ct. App. Jan. 12, 2015). · cites it 12× “” Minn. Stat. § 322B.833, subd. 1, 1(2)(ii) (2012); see also Stone v.”
Guava LLC v. Spencer Merkel, No. A15-254 (Minn. Ct. App. Aug. 17, 2015). · cites it 8× “Minn. Stat. § 322B.833, subd. 1(3)(i) (2014) authorizes the court to grant “any equitable relief it considers just and reasonable in the circumstances” in an action by a creditor of an LLC when the creditor’s claim has been reduced to judgment and execution has been returned…”
Nelson v. Jerentosky, No. 0:21-cv-02679 (D. Minn. Sept. 26, 2022). · cites it 2× “” Minn. Stat. § 322B.833, subd. 4 (2012) (repealed effective August 1, 2015).”
Margaret Burrell Hall v. Barbara Jeanne Hall, No. A14-1516 (Minn. Ct. App. May 26, 2015). · cites it 2× “833 violated appellants’ due process rights because respondent did not bring a claim under Minn. Stat. § 322B.833. While we need not reach this issue because we reverse and remand on other grounds, we address it as a matter of judicial economy.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.