Minn. Stat. » CHAPTER 323. UNIFORM PARTNERSHIP ACT
Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 323.21 (2026)

[Repealed]

✓ text as last checked Sept. 2026 (this copy records no edition or section history)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

[Repealed, 1997 c 174 art 12 s 68; 1998 c 262 s 12]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1949–1988 · leading case: Wilson v. Moline, 38 N.W.2d 201 (Minn. 1949).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Wilson v. Moline, 38 N.W.2d 201 (Minn. 1949). · cites it 2× “2 If § 323.21 3 (right to an account) is read with § 323.”
In Re Est. of Renczykowski, 409 N.W.2d 888 (Minn. Ct. App. 1987). · cites it 2× “20 (1986) a partner or the partner’s estate is accountable as a fiduciary for any profits derived by him without his partner’s consent from the “conduct, liquidation of the partnership or from any use by that partner of its property.”
Sit v. T & M Props., 408 N.W.2d 182 (Minn. Ct. App. 1987). · cites it 2× “See Minn.Stat. § 323.21 (1986) (partner wrongfully excluded from partnership business entitled to formal accounting).”
Leonard v. Smieja, 366 N.W.2d 372 (Minn. Ct. App. 1985). · cites it 2× “See Minn.Stat. § 323.21 (1982). Likewise, he had the right to request court dissolution of the partnership.”
Tjernlund v. Kadrie, 425 N.W.2d 292 (Minn. Ct. App. 1988). · cites it 2× “Because he failed to plead this affirmative defense at any time during trial, the issue is not properly before this court.”
Minn. Stat. § 323.21(4): 1 case
Tjernlund v. Kadrie, 425 N.W.2d 292 (Minn. Ct. App. 1988). “Because he failed to plead this affirmative defense at any time during trial, the issue is not properly before this court.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.