Minnesota Statutes
Minn. Stat. § 323.35 (2026)
[Repealed]
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
[Repealed, 1997 c 174 art 12 s 68; 1998 c 262 s 12]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases, 1952–1987 · leading case: Gjovik v. Strope, 401 N.W.2d 664 (Minn. 1987).
Gjovik v. Strope, 401 N.W.2d 664 (Minn. 1987). “The circumstances under which this is possible are set forth in Minn.Stat. § 323.35 (1986): The dissolution of the partnership does not of itself discharge the existing liability of any partner.”
Stacker & Ravich v. Simon, 411 N.W.2d 217 (Minn. Ct. App. 1987). “Under Minn.Stat. § 323.35: The dissolution of the partnership does not of itself discharge the existing liability of any partner.”
Straus v. Straus, 94 N.W.2d 679 (Minn. 1959). “If dissolution is caused by expulsion of a partner, bona fide under the partnership agreement, and if the expelled partner is discharged from all partnership liabilities, either by payment or agreement under section 323.35, he shall receive in cash only the net amount due him…”
Gjovik v. Strope, 392 N.W.2d 351 (Minn. Ct. App. 1986). “See Minn. Stat. § 323.35 (1984). A partner is discharged from any existing liability upon dissolution of the partnership by express contract between that partner, the person continuing the business, and the partnership creditor, or by the inference of such a contract from the…”
United States v. Seppa, 12 F.R.D. 251 (D. Minn. 1952). “2 The motion for summary judgment is in the nature of -a pretrial inquiry for the purpose of determining whether a genuine issue of fact exists, rather than for the purpose of determining an issue of fact.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.