Minn. Stat. » CHAPTER 325. MANUFACTURES AND SALES
Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 325.907 (2026)

[Repealed]

✓ text as last checked Sept. 2026 (this copy records no edition or section history)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

MS 1978 [Renumbered 8.31]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1978–1992 · leading case: Jacobs v. Rosemount Dodge-Winnebago South, 310 N.W.2d 71 (Minn. 1981).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Jacobs v. Rosemount Dodge-Winnebago South, 310 N.W.2d 71 (Minn. 1981). · cites it 4× “” Minn.Stat. § 325.907, subd. 3a (1978). The laws referred to in subdivision 1 of section 325.”
Meyers v. Postal Fin. Co., 287 N.W.2d 614 (Minn. 1979). · cites it 2× “] Plaintiffs argue, however, that this statute was superseded by Minn.Stat. § 325.907, subd. 3a, which creates a civil action for damages for violations of, inter alia, the Consumer Fraud Act.”
Fox Chem. Co. v. Amsoil, Inc., 445 F. Supp. 1355 (D. Minn. 1978). “Unfortunately, this state statute does not contain a statute of limitations thus requiring a decision as to which of Minnesota’s two general statutes of limitation would apply to this statutory cause of action.”
Church of the Nativity of Our Lord v. WatPro, Inc., 491 N.W.2d 1 (Minn. 1992). · cites it 4× “3a, was Minn.Stat. § 325.907, subd. 3a (1978), the same chapter wherein the Consumer Fraud Act then appeared.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.