Minn. Stat. » CHAPTER 325D. RESTRAINT OF TRADE
Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 325D.57 (2026)

Damages

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Any person, any governmental body, or the state of Minnesota or any of its subdivisions or agencies, injured directly or indirectly by a violation of sections 325D.49 to 325D.66, shall recover three times the actual damages sustained, together with costs and disbursements, including reasonable attorneys' fees. In any subsequent action arising from the same conduct, the court may take any steps necessary to avoid duplicative recovery against a defendant.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 44 cases (5 in the last 5 years), 1981–2025 · leading case: Lorix v. Crompton Corp., 736 N.W.2d 619 (Minn. 2007).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Lorix v. Crompton Corp., 736 N.W.2d 619 (Minn. 2007). · cites it 32× “We reverse and hold that the plaintiff has standing to sue under Minn. Stat. § 325D.57 (2006). In this antitrust class action, Plaintiff Diane Lorix alleges that defendants Crompton Corporation, Uniroyal Chemical Company, Inc.”
State Ex Rel. Humphrey v. Philip Morris Inc., 551 N.W.2d 490 (Minn. 1996). · cites it 6× “Minn.Stat. § 325D.57 (1994) (emphasis added).”
Phelps v. Commonwealth Land Title Ins. Co., 537 N.W.2d 271 (Minn. 1995). · cites it 4× “731 , § 4 (1992); Minn.Stat. § 325D.57 (1994). [3] Similarly, victims of housing discrimination also have specific remedies available in addition to the general remedies cited.”
Comes v. Microsoft Corp., 646 N.W.2d 440 (Iowa 2002). · cites it 2× “778 (2) (enacted in 1984); Minn.Stat. Ann. § 325D.57 (enacted in 1984); N.”
Freeman Indus., LLC v. Eastman Chem. Co., 172 S.W.3d 512 (Tenn. 2005). “778 (1985); Minn.Stat. § 325D.57 (1984); Miss. Code Ann.”
Bunker's Glass Co. v. PILKINGTON, PLC, 75 P.3d 99 (Ariz. 2003). · cites it 2× “778 (2) (2001); Minnesota, Minn.Stat. § 325D.57 (1995); Mississippi, Miss.”
Johnson v. Microsoft Corp., 106 Ohio St. 3d 278 (Ohio 2005). “778(2); Minnesota, Minn. StatAnn. 325D.57; Mississippi, Miss.”
Supreme Auto Transp., LLC v. Arcelor Mittal USA, Inc., 902 F.3d 735 (7th Cir. 2018). “778(2) ; Minn. Stat. § 325D.57 ; Miss. Code Ann. § 75-21-9 ; Neb.”
Lorix v. Crompton Corp., 720 N.W.2d 15 (Minn. Ct. App. 2006). · cites it 8× “” Minn.Stat. § 325D.57 (2004). In 1984, the Minnesota legislature added the words “directly or indirectly” to section 325D.”
California v. ARC Am. Corp., 490 U.S. 93 (1989). “1989) (allowing recovery "regardless of whether such injured person dealt directly or indirectly with the defendant"); Minn. Stat. § 325D.57 (1988) (allowing recovery by any person "injured directly or indirectly").”
Ciardi v. F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Ltd., 436 Mass. 53 (Mass. 2002). “” Minn. Stat. Ann. § 325D.57 (2000). S.D. Codified Laws § 37-1-33 (2000).”
Karen Stromberg v. Qualcomm Inc., 14 F.4th 1059 (9th Cir. 2021). “Minn. Stat. Ann. § 325D.57; N.Y. Gen. Bus.”
Show all 44 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.