Minnesota Statutes
Minn. Stat. § 340.07 (2026)
[Repealed]
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
[Repealed, 1985 c 305 art 13 s 1; renumbered in part 340A.101, subd 15a]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 16
cases, 1948–1985 · leading case: Arens v. Vill. of Rogers, 61 N.W.2d 508 (Minn. 1953).
Arens v. Vill. of Rogers, 61 N.W.2d 508 (Minn. 1953). “On July 1, 1950, one day following the expiration of plaintiffs’ licenses, defendant, by the authority granted in §§ 340.07, subd. 5, and 340.11, subd. 10, commenced operation of an on- and off-sale municipal liquor store.”
Cole v. City of Spring Lake Park, 314 N.W.2d 836 (Minn. 1982). “2 beer [not an intoxicating liquor under Minn.Stat. § 340.07 (1980)], nor an out-of-state vendor.”
Stabs v. City of Tower, 40 N.W.2d 362 (Minn. 1949). “We take judicial notice of the facts that defendant is a city of the fourth class and, as such, is a municipality other than a city of the first, second, or third class and entitled under § 340.07, subd. 5, to own and operate a municipal liquor store, and that defendant is…”
Beck v. Groe, 70 N.W.2d 886 (Minn. 1955). “40, all statutes * * * shall be and remain in full force and effect, so far as the same in any way relate to intoxicating liquors, and keeping of unlicensed drinking places, or the sale or disposition of such liquors to any person or class of persons or any penalty or liability…”
Holmquist v. Miller, 352 N.W.2d 47 (Minn. Ct. App. 1984). “In its literal language, the Act imposes liability on everyone, vendors and nonvendors alike. The term "person" is not defined in the Act, other than a reference in another section of Chapter 340 that it includes political bodies, corporations, partnerships, and other…”
Miller Brewing Co. v. State, 284 N.W.2d 353 (Minn. 1979). “However, state regulations discriminating against imported liquor, such as § 340.07, subd. 2, do not violate the commerce clause.”
George Benz Sons, Inc. v. Ericson, 34 N.W.2d 725 (Minn. 1948). “1, as follows: “The terms ‘intoxicating liquor’ and ‘liquor’ when used in sections 340.07 to 340.40 mean and include ethyl alcohol and include distilled, fermented, spirituous, vinous, and malt beverages containing in excess of 3.”
Hahn v. City of Ortonville, 57 N.W.2d 254 (Minn. 1953). “It is recognized that, when a statute is not explicit but requires construction, a stricter interpretation is required to establish a legislative intent to fix a liability in derogation of a sovereign immunity than where the liability is imposed only with respect to a…”
Minneapolis Gas Co. v. Zimmerman, 91 N.W.2d 642 (Minn. 1958). “1957, § 340.07(5); Illinois Smith-Hurd Stat. Ann.”
E.T.O., Inc. v. Town of Marion, 375 N.W.2d 815 (Minn. 1985). “Minn.Stat. § 340.07, subd. 11 (1984) (current version codified as Minn.”
Minter Bros. v. Hochman, 42 N.W.2d 562 (Minn. 1950). “” Section 340.07, subd. 1, which reads in part: “* * * The term ‘wholesaler’ means any person engaged in the business of selling intoxicating liquor to retail dealers.”
Lund v. Vill. of Watson, 109 N.W.2d 564 (Minn. 1961). “12 of the Liquor Control Act (§ 340.07, et seq.), which requires as a condition precedent to the issuance of a license that the licensee will, among other things, furnish a bond or insurance policy and will pay “damages for death or injury caused by or resulting from the…”
— Minn. Stat. § 340.07(5) — 1 case
Minneapolis Gas Co. v. Zimmerman, 91 N.W.2d 642 (Minn. 1958). “1957, § 340.07(5); Illinois Smith-Hurd Stat. Ann.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.