Minn. Stat. » CHAPTER 363. DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 363.072 (2026)

[Repealed]

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

[Renumbered 363A.30]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 13 cases, 1971–2013 · leading case: Rasmussen v. Two Harbors Fish Co., 832 N.W.2d 790 (Minn. 2013).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Rasmussen v. Two Harbors Fish Co., 832 N.W.2d 790 (Minn. 2013). · cites it 2× “Minn.Stat. § 363.072 (1978). In Continental Can, the hearing officer, acting as the fact-finder, determined that the employer violated the MHRA.”
Cnty. of Hennepin v. Civil Rights Comm'n of City of Minneapolis, 355 N.W.2d 458 (Minn. Ct. App. 1984). · cites it 6× “Minn.Stat. § 363.072, subd. 1 (Supp.1983).”
State Ex Rel. Johnson v. Porter Farms, Inc., 382 N.W.2d 543 (Minn. Ct. App. 1986). · cites it 2× “Minn.Stat. § 363.072 (1984). This court may modify or reverse its decision only if we find its findings, inferences, conclusions or decision is (a) In violation of constitutional provisions; or (b) In excess of the statutory authority or jurisdiction of the agency; or (c) Made…”
City of Minneapolis v. Richardson, 239 N.W.2d 197 (Minn. 1976). “(§ 363.072, incorporating the appellate procedures of the Administrative Procedure Act, Minn.”
Lamb v. Vill. of Bagley, 310 N.W.2d 508 (Minn. 1981). · cites it 2× “After that decision, however, the legislature amended Minn.Stat. § 363.072, subd. 1, to allow the commissioner, in addition to any person aggrieved, to seek judicial review of a final decision of the department.”
Minnesota Dep't of Highways v. Minnesota Dep't of Human Rights, 241 N.W.2d 310 (Minn. 1976). · cites it 2× “09, clauses (b) and (g) from an order of the district court issued pursuant to section 363.072, subdivision 1.” Minn. St.”
State v. Sci. Computers, Inc., 384 N.W.2d 560 (Minn. Ct. App. 1986). · cites it 2× “Pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 363.072, subd. 1 (1984), judicial review of the Department’s decision is governed by the Administrative Procedure Act, Minn.”
Blanding v. Sports & Health Club, Inc., 373 N.W.2d 784 (Minn. Ct. App. 1985). · cites it 8× “Minn.Stat. § 363.072, subd. 1 (Supp.1983).”
State Ex Rel. Wilson v. St. Joseph's Hosp., 366 N.W.2d 403 (Minn. Ct. App. 1985). · cites it 2× “Minn.Stat. § 363.072, subd. 2 (1984). Minn.”
State Ex Rel. Balfour v. Bergeron, 187 N.W.2d 680 (Minn. 1971). “Respondent did not, as authorized by § 363.072, appeal to the district court, and the examiner’s decision became final.”
Minn. Dept. of Hwys. v. MINN. DEPT. OF HR, 241 N.W.2d 310 (Minn. 1976). · cites it 2× “09, clauses (b) and (g) from an order of the district court issued pursuant to section 363.072, subdivision 1." Minn.St.”
State ex rel. Johnson v. Floyd Wild, Inc., 384 N.W.2d 185 (Minn. Ct. App. 1986). · cites it 2× “It is creating an additional exemption to the provisions of Minn.Stat. § 363.072 because Floyd Wild, Inc.”
Show all 13 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.