Minnesota Statutes
Minn. Stat. § 4.01 (2026)
Custodian Of State Property
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
In addition to the powers and duties prescribed by the constitution, the governor shall be the custodian of all property of the state not especially entrusted by law to other officers and may take possession thereof without legal process and adopt such measures for its safekeeping as the governor deems proper.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 17
cases, 1972–2016 · leading case: In Re Hennepin Cnty. 1986 Recycling Bond Litig., 540 N.W.2d 494 (Minn. 1995).
In Re Hennepin Cnty. 1986 Recycling Bond Litig., 540 N.W.2d 494 (Minn. 1995). “Section 4.01 sets out the County's agreement to lend the bond proceeds to HERC.”
State v. Powers, 654 N.W.2d 667 (Minn. 2003). “Thus, we conclude appellant’s absence from the hearing to respond to the jury’s question harmless beyond a reasonable doubt.”
Greene v. Comm'r of the Minnesota Dep't of Human Servs., 755 N.W.2d 713 (Minn. 2008). “We conclude that the distinctions in the statute are legitimate. Tribes have "plenary and exclusive power over their members," but a tribe's authority over members of another Indian tribe and non-Indians is limited.”
Inland Constr. Co. v. City of Bloomington, 195 N.W.2d 558 (Minn. 1972). “The court below concluded that the action of the council was more broadly based and that the council had more in mind than the narrow stated grounds and was concerned with other requirements of the Zoning Ordinance; the general purpose of the ordinance as set forth in § 4.01; 3…”
Heise v. Genuine Parts Co., 900 F. Supp. 1137 (D. Minnesota 1995). “Further, disability retirement benefits are not reduced by the fraction set forth in Section 4.01(c) for participants who have less than fifteen years of credited service.”
In re Nat'l Hockey League Players' Concussion Injury Litig., 189 F. Supp. 3d 856 (D. Minnesota 2016). “So, Plaintiffs are not currently members of the Union, and each of the seven CBAs that were, in effect while various Plaintiffs were active players includes provisions stating that the grievance procedure and arbitration process are only binding upon the "Player(s) and Club(s)…”
In Re the Welfare of G.L.H., 614 N.W.2d 718 (Minn. 2000). “Sonsteng & Robert Scott, Minnesota Practice — Juvenile Law and Practice, § 4.01, at 49 (1985). Like criminal defendants, juveniles in delinquency proceedings have a constitutional right to counsel.”
State v. Arkell, 672 N.W.2d 564 (Minn. 2003). “, City Code § 4.01 (1999). Violation of the State Building Code constitutes a misdemeanor.”
State v. Rawland, 199 N.W.2d 774 (Minn. 1972). “” (c) The test proposed by the American Law Institute (model Penal Code, Proposed Official Draft, 1962, § 4.01): “(1) A person is not responsible for criminal conduct if at the time of such conduct as a result of mental disease or defect he lacks substantial capacity either to…”
State v. Carlson, 328 N.W.2d 690 (Minn. 1982). “Model Penal Code § 4.01 (Final Draft, 1962) reads as follows: (1) A person is not responsible for criminal conduct if at the time of such conduct, as a result of mental disease or defect, he lacks substantial capacity either to appreciate the criminality of his conduct or to…”
Regents of the Univ. v. Applied Innovations, Inc., 685 F. Supp. 698 (D. Minnesota 1987). “18, § 4.01[A]. 11. There is a split of authority concerning whether a registration certificate creates a presumption in favor of the plaintiffs that notice formalities have been duly observed.”
Pierce v. Otter Tail Cnty., 524 N.W.2d 308 (Minn. Ct. App. 1994). “, Solid Waste Ordinance § 4.01 (Dec. 21, 1988). The ordinance is functionally equivalent to zoning because it regulates the use of land.”
— Minn. Stat. § 4.01(c) — 2 cases
Heise v. Genuine Parts Co., 900 F. Supp. 1137 (D. Minnesota 1995). “Further, disability retirement benefits are not reduced by the fraction set forth in Section 4.01(c) for participants who have less than fifteen years of credited service.”
Triple Five of Minnesota, Inc. v. Simon, 280 F. Supp. 2d 895 (D. Minnesota 2003).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.