Minn. Stat. » CHAPTER 4. GOVERNOR
Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 4.12 (2026)

[Repealed]

✓ text as last checked Sept. 2026 (this copy records no edition or section history)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

[Renumbered 116J.42]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1970–2024 · leading case: Teng Moua v. Jani-King of Minnesota, Inc., 810 F. Supp. 2d 882 (D. Minn. 2011).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Teng Moua v. Jani-King of Minnesota, Inc., 810 F. Supp. 2d 882 (D. Minn. 2011). · cites it 5× “See Manual § 4.12(1). No document creates a duty to discuss the account history with the new franchisee.”
White v. Nat'l Football League, 822 F. Supp. 1389 (D. Minn. 1993). “§ 4.12, at 4-40 ("[t]he Advisory Committee Notes to Rule 23 emphasize that subdivision (b)(2) is not limited to civil rights cases”, and the Note explicitly cites "price discrimination by wholesalers against a class of retailers and tying violations by patentees as examples in…”
Kehne Elec. Co. v. Steenberg Constr. Co., 177 N.W.2d 309 (Minn. 1970). · cites it 2× “” Section 4.12 provides: “Maintenance of the Dike shall be the responsibility of the Contractor until the completed project is accepted by the Sanitary District.”
Bott v. Gravier, No. 0:24-cv-00524 (D. Minn. Mar. 22, 2024). “at § 4.12.) No such vote was attained. Third, Plaintiffs are likely to succeed in showing that the Gravier Defendants’ actions that resulted in an amendment to the terms of Tim Bott’s 2016 EEA (by transferring his responsibilities for material financial, corporate and legal…”
Minn. Stat. § 4.12(1): 1 case
Teng Moua v. Jani-King of Minnesota, Inc., 810 F. Supp. 2d 882 (D. Minn. 2011). “See Manual § 4.12(1). No document creates a duty to discuss the account history with the new franchisee.”
Minn. Stat. § 4.12(5): 1 case
Teng Moua v. Jani-King of Minnesota, Inc., 810 F. Supp. 2d 882 (D. Minn. 2011). “See Manual § 4.12(1). No document creates a duty to discuss the account history with the new franchisee.”
Minn. Stat. § 4.12(6): 1 case
Teng Moua v. Jani-King of Minnesota, Inc., 810 F. Supp. 2d 882 (D. Minn. 2011). “See Manual § 4.12(1). No document creates a duty to discuss the account history with the new franchisee.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.