Minnesota Statutes
Minn. Stat. § 4.14 (2026)
[Repealed]
✓ text as last checked Sept. 2026 (this copy records no edition or section history)
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
[Repealed, 1973 c 741 s 10]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6
cases, 1961–2010 · leading case: Benoit v. Comm'r of Revenue, 453 N.W.2d 336 (Minn. 1990).
Benoit v. Comm'r of Revenue, 453 N.W.2d 336 (Minn. 1990). “Section 4.14 of the security agreement provided, in part, Until the borrower’s authority to do so is terminated by the Lender * * * the Borrower will, at the Borrower’s sole cost and expense, but on the Lender’s behalf and for the Lender's account, collect as the Lender’s…”
Sierra Club v. Clinton, 689 F. Supp. 2d 1123 (D. Minn. 2010). “With respect to the cumulative effects, the FEIS considers both Enbridge and non-Enbridge pipeline projects in its analysis of cumulative impacts in Section 4.14 and acknowledges that there are other existing and proposed projects that could result in similar impacts to those of…”
Blaine v. Anoka-Hennepin Indep. Sch. Dist. No. 11, 498 N.W.2d 309 (Minn. Ct. App. 1993). “03(e), the court may direct the manner of such service.” 4. Appellants also argue that respondent is estopped from arguing ineffective service of process because the superintendents specifically represented that they were authorized to accept service on behalf of the school…”
Woodson v. Int'l Bhd. of Elec. Workers Local 292, 974 F. Supp. 1256 (D. Minn. 1997). “” Agreement § 4.14. Any applicant who is rejected by a contractor is returned to his place on the list and is referred to other employment.”
Lemke v. Lemke, 108 N.W.2d 344 (Minn. 1961). “(2d) 526 ; 1 Nelson, Divorce and Annulment, § 4.14; 27A C. J. S.; Divorce, § 36(3); Annotation, 19 A.”
Nichols v. Connecticut Gen. Ins., 186 N.W.2d 190 (Minn. 1971). “A lump-sum settlement in lieu of retirement income is an option available to a terminated employee under Sections 4.14 and 4.10. However, the section which the trial court found decisive was Section 1.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.