Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 41.02 (2026)

[Repealed]

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

[Repealed, 1973 c 87 s 3; 1973 c 494 s 3]

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 2 cases, 1997–2014 · leading case: Woody v. City of Duluth, 176 F.R.D. 310 (D. Minnesota 1997).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Woody v. City of Duluth, 176 F.R.D. 310 (D. Minnesota 1997). “Moore, Moore’s Federal Practice, § 41.02, at 41-14 (1988), and 9 Charles A.”

In the Matter of the Cross Application of Anthony E. Sampair & Laurie K. Sampair to register the title to the following described real Est. situated in Washington Cnty., Minnesota, namely: Lots 1 & 2, Block 1, Lakewood Park Third Addition, applicants v. Josephine Berg Simes, State of Minnesota (Minn. Ct. App. 2014). “Haydock, Minnesota Practice § 41.02 cmt. 41:21 (5th ed. 2014) (“After a motion has been denied, the defendant then decides whether to pursue the right to present evidence in an effort to contradict or rebut plaintiff's case or to 8 rest permitting the court to rely on the…”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.