Minn. Stat. » CHAPTER 43. STATE CIVIL SERVICE
Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 43.24 (2026)

[Repealed]

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

[Repealed, 1979 c 332 art 1 s 114; 1981 c 210 s 55]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 12 cases, 1943–1986 · leading case: Johnson v. Dirkswager, 315 N.W.2d 215 (Minn. 1982).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Johnson v. Dirkswager, 315 N.W.2d 215 (Minn. 1982). · cites it 6× “It also found, however, that defendants had not acted outside the limits of their lawful authority under Minn.Stat. § 43.24 (1980), so the civil rights claim failed.”
Ramsey Cnty. Cmty. Human Servs. Dep't v. Davila, 387 N.W.2d 421 (Minn. 1986). · cites it 8× “1980), we construed this provision of the Act, noting that a section of the Bloomington Home Rule Charter and Merit System Rules conflicted with a state civil service rule, Minn.Stat. § 43.24, subd. 2 (Supp.1979). In conducting a veterans preference hearing in Leininger , the…”
Walter v. Indep. Sch. Dist. No. 457, 323 N.W.2d 37 (Minn. 1982). · cites it 4× “2d 583 (1948), in which a civil service employee requested reinstatement to his position under Minn.Stat. § 43.24 (1944), this court cited with approval Berg v.”
Leininger v. City of Bloomington, 299 N.W.2d 723 (Minn. 1980). · cites it 3× “We find, therefore, that Minn.Stat. §§ 43.24, .30, 197.455, and .46, read together, impliedly authorize the Bloomington Merit Board to fashion a remedy other than that determined by the City, if the evidence presents extenuating circumstances.”
S. Minnesota Mun. Power Agency v. Schrader, 394 N.W.2d 796 (Minn. 1986). · cites it 2× “We then found "that Minn.Stat. §§ 43.24,.30, 197.455 and .46, read together, impliedly authorize the Bloomington Merit Board to fashion a remedy other than that determined by the City, if the evidence presents extenuating circumstances.”
S. Minnesota Mun. Power Agency v. Schrader, 380 N.W.2d 169 (Minn. Ct. App. 1986). · cites it 2× “See Minn.Stat. § 43.24, subd. 2 (the board has the discretion to modify the appointing authority’s action on grounds of extenuating circumstances).”
Mrkonjich v. Erie Mining Co., 334 N.W.2d 378 (Minn. 1983). · cites it 2× “Fogerty had challenged his discharge under Minn.Stat. § 43.24, subd. 2 (1980), which provides for a contested case hearing before a hearing examiner.”
Gibson v. Civil Serv. Bd., 171 N.W.2d 712 (Minn. 1969). “The issue before us is whether there was substantial evidence to support the Civil Service Board’s findings and its conclusion that there was “just cause” for the removal of Mrs.”
Spurck v. Civil Serv. Bd., 42 N.W.2d 720 (Minn. 1950). “” Further, § 43.24, subd. 1, forbids not only discharge, but reductions in pay or position without just eause.”
Hagen v. State Civil Serv. Bd., 164 N.W.2d 629 (Minn. 1969). “” Consistent with the provisions of § 43.24, Civil Service Rule 10.6, par. 2, provides in part: “No employee who has permanent civil service status shall be dismissed from his position except for just cause.”
Kunze v. White Bear Lake Police Civil Serv. Comm'n, 319 N.W.2d 61 (Minn. 1982). · cites it 2× “Minn.Stat. § 43.24 (1980), which governs state civil service, is not applicable to this case.”
State Ex Rel. Carstater v. Civil Serv. Bd., 10 N.W.2d 422 (Minn. 1943). “§ 43.24 (§ 254-72), upon the grounds, among others stated, following: “III.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.