Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 471.633 (2026)

Firearms

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

The legislature preempts all authority of a home rule charter or statutory city including a city of the first class, county, town, municipal corporation, or other governmental subdivision, or any of their instrumentalities, to regulate firearms, ammunition, or their respective components to the complete exclusion of any order, ordinance or regulation by them except that:

(a) a governmental subdivision may regulate the discharge of firearms; and

(b) a governmental subdivision may adopt regulations identical to state law.

Local regulation inconsistent with this section is void.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1995–2022 · leading case: Lilly v. City of Minneapolis, 527 N.W.2d 107 (Minn. Ct. App. 1995).
Lilly v. City of Minneapolis, 527 N.W.2d 107 (Minn. Ct. App. 1995). · cites it 4× “, Minn.Stat. § 471.633 (1992) (providing that the "legislature preempts all authority of a home rule charter" city to regulate firearms except as expressly provided by that statute); Minn.”
State v. Eide, 898 N.W.2d 290 (Minn. Ct. App. 2017). · cites it 52× “Minn. Stat. § 471.633 . The legislature has specifically authorized the MAC to adopt ordinances related to the management of its airports and has established that violations are misdemeanors.”
Perkins v. City of St. Paul, 982 F. Supp. 652 (D. Minnesota 1997). · cites it 6× “The State of Minnesota subsequently enaétéd Minn.Stat. § 471.633, which preempted local regulation of retail gun sales.”
Koscielski v. City of Minneapolis, 393 F. Supp. 2d 811 (D. Minnesota 2005). · cites it 2× “First, Plaintiffs requested a declaration that the ordinance violates Minn. Stat. §§ 471.633 (legislature preempts city authority to regulate firearms) and 471.”
Christopher v. Ramsey Cnty. (D. Minnesota 2022). · cites it 6× “Minn. Stat. § 471.633 . Section 624.717 reads: Sections 624.”
City of Cincinnati v. Baskin, 112 Ohio St. 3d 279 (Ohio 2006). “1102; Minn.Stat. 471.633; Miss.Code Ann. 45-9-51; Mo.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.