Minn. Stat. » CHAPTER 487. COUNTY COURTS
Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 487.11 (2026)

[Repealed]

✓ text as last checked Sept. 2026 (this copy records no edition or section history)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

[Repealed, 2006 c 260 art 5 s 54]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1984–1989 · leading case: Brandt v. State, 428 N.W.2d 412 (Minn. Ct. App. 1988).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Brandt v. State, 428 N.W.2d 412 (Minn. Ct. App. 1988). · cites it 8× “2 (1980) and Minn.Stat. § 487.11, subd. 2 (1980). Id. at 538.”
State v. Kramer, 441 N.W.2d 502 (Minn. Ct. App. 1989). · cites it 6× “01 or Minn. Stat. § 487.11 , Subd. 2; and who is capable of furnishing the accurate recording of court proceedings by any method including (a) stenographic machine; (b) electronic recording equipment; (c) Pitman shorthand; or (d) any other appropriate and reasonable device; and…”
Paske v. Cnty. of Dakota, 379 N.W.2d 537 (Minn. 1986). · cites it 2× “” Minn.Stat. § 487.11, subd. 2 (1980) authorizes the use of electronic equipment to record court proceedings but goes on to provide that: [A]t the request of any party to any proceedings the court may in its discretion require the proceedings to be recorded by a competent court…”
Paske v. Cnty. of Dakota, 356 N.W.2d 775 (Minn. Ct. App. 1984). · cites it 2× “Minn.Stat. § 487.11, subd. 2, and § 486.01 (1982).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.