Minnesota Statutes
Minn. Stat. § 488.20 (2026)
[Repealed]
✓ text as last checked Sept. 2026 (this copy records no edition or section history)
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
MS 1957 [Repealed, 1959 c 660 s 22]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8
cases, 1962–1973 · leading case: Colten v. Kentucky, 407 U.S. 104 (1972).
Colten v. Kentucky, 407 U.S. 104 (1972). “1972); Minn. Stat. §§ 488.20 , 633.20 et seq. (1969); Miss.”
City of St. Paul v. Hitzmann, 204 N.W.2d 417 (Minn. 1973). “6, 1 which applied specifically to Hen *303 nepin County and directed ordinance violations to be tried without a jury, was constitutional because defendant had a right to jury trial on appeal under § 488.20. 2 We said ( 286 Minn. 557 , 176 N.”
State v. Leininger, 176 N.W.2d 629 (Minn. 1970). “In the event of such trial without jury, there shall be a right of appeal as provided in Section 488.20 * * Minn. St. 488.20 provides: “Appeals may be taken in the district court of the county from the judgments of municipal courts in the same cases, upon the same procedure, and…”
Haaf v. Bd. of Cnty. Com'rs of Benton Cnty., 337 F. Supp. 772 (D. Minn. 1971). “, Minn.Stat. §§ 488.20, 488A.10. This point was neither briefed nor argued at any length and the court indicates no conclusion on this issue at this time.”
City of St. Paul v. Sutherland, 132 N.W.2d 280 (Minn. 1964). “However, in the case of a conviction for violation of an ordinance, appeal may be made to the district court whereupon the defendant shall be entitled to a trial de novo therein, with or without a jury, but otherwise with all the rights and subject to the procedures prescribed…”
State v. McKinnon, 140 N.W.2d 608 (Minn. 1966). “Under § 488.20, appeals to the district court from the municipal court are in turn governed by the statute applicable to appeals from justice courts.”
State v. Kalkbrenner, 116 N.W.2d 560 (Minn. 1962). “If the proceedings before us are appellate in nature, we call attention to the fact that appeals from the municipal court of the city of Faribault must be taken directly to the district court and not to the supreme court under § 488.20. Hence we have no appellate jurisdiction…”
State v. Brown, 165 N.W.2d 557 (Minn. 1969). “He perfected an appeal to the district court of that county pursuant to §§ 488.20 and 633.20, including posting a surety bond approved by the municipal judge.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.