Minn. Stat. » CHAPTER 5. SECRETARY OF STATE
Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 5.32 (2026)

[Repealed]

✓ text as last checked Sept. 2026 (this copy records no edition or section history)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

MS 2010 [Expired, 2007 c 148 art 2 s 6; 2009 c 101 art 2 s 13]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1972–2016 · leading case: Greyhound Comput. Corp. v. Int'l Bus. MacHines Corp., 342 F. Supp. 1143 (D. Minn. 1972).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Greyhound Comput. Corp. v. Int'l Bus. MacHines Corp., 342 F. Supp. 1143 (D. Minn. 1972). “See also Manual for Complex and Multidistrict Litigation, Part I, § 5.32(2) (West Pub. Co. 1970) : “[S]ince § 1404(a) and § 1407 are not mutually exclusive but .”
Steven Wrolstad v. Benjamin Napper, No. A16-422 (Minn. Ct. App. Dec. 19, 2016). · cites it 5× “” SMO § 5.32(C)(1) (1994). It also requires a permit to move “more than 50 cubic yards of material outside of steep slopes.”
Minn. Stat. § 5.32(2): 1 case
Greyhound Comput. Corp. v. Int'l Bus. MacHines Corp., 342 F. Supp. 1143 (D. Minn. 1972). “See also Manual for Complex and Multidistrict Litigation, Part I, § 5.32(2) (West Pub. Co. 1970) : “[S]ince § 1404(a) and § 1407 are not mutually exclusive but .”
Minn. Stat. § 5.32(C)(1): 1 case
Steven Wrolstad v. Benjamin Napper, No. A16-422 (Minn. Ct. App. Dec. 19, 2016). “” SMO § 5.32(C)(1) (1994). It also requires a permit to move “more than 50 cubic yards of material outside of steep slopes.”
Minn. Stat. § 5.32(C)(2): 1 case
Steven Wrolstad v. Benjamin Napper, No. A16-422 (Minn. Ct. App. Dec. 19, 2016). “” SMO § 5.32(C)(1) (1994). It also requires a permit to move “more than 50 cubic yards of material outside of steep slopes.”
Minn. Stat. § 5.32(D)(7): 1 case
Steven Wrolstad v. Benjamin Napper, No. A16-422 (Minn. Ct. App. Dec. 19, 2016). “” SMO § 5.32(C)(1) (1994). It also requires a permit to move “more than 50 cubic yards of material outside of steep slopes.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.