Minnesota Statutes
Minn. Stat. § 50.03 (2026)
[Repealed]
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
[Repealed, 1997 c 157 s 72]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6
cases, 1982–1988 · leading case: State Ex Rel. Spannaus v. Hopf, 323 N.W.2d 746 (Minn. 1982).
State Ex Rel. Spannaus v. Hopf, 323 N.W.2d 746 (Minn. 1982). “Davis, Administrative Law Treatise § 50.03, at 299 (1958). Since Naegele has raised no procedural objections, the question is whether 37(F)(4) is within the granted power and is reasonable.”
Blocher Outdoor Advert. Co. v. Minnesota Dep't of Transp., 347 N.W.2d 88 (Minn. Ct. App. 1984). “Davis, Administrative Law Treatise, § 50.03 at 299 (1958)); Minn. Stat. § 14.”
Broen Mem'l Home v. Minnesota Dep't of Human Servs., 364 N.W.2d 436 (Minn. Ct. App. 1985). “Davis, Administrative Law Treatise, § 50.03 at 299 (1958)); Minn.Stat. § 14.38, subd.”
Flores v. Dep't of Jobs & Training, 393 N.W.2d 231 (Minn. Ct. App. 1986). “A rule promulgated pursuant to statutory authority: is valid and is as binding upon a court as a statute if it is (a) within the granted power, (b) issued pursuant to proper procedure, and (c) reasonable.”
Contested Case of Christian Nursing Ctr. v. Dep't of Human Servs., 419 N.W.2d 86 (Minn. Ct. App. 1988). “Davis, Administrative Law Treatise § 50.03, at 299 (1958)). Hopf, however, involved an eminent domain proceeding involving the filing of a condemnation petition and a court action, rather than a declaratory judgment action to determine the validity of a rule, as is the case here.”
Mammenga v. State Dep't of Human Servs., 428 N.W.2d 832 (Minn. Ct. App. 1988). “Davis, Administrative Law Treatise, Section 50.03 at 299 (1st ed. 1958) (emphasis added).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.