Minnesota Statutes
Minn. Stat. § 501B.14 (2026)
[Repealed]
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
MS 2014 [Repealed, 2015 c 5 art 16 s 2]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases, 1998–2009 · leading case: In Re the Revocable Trust of Margolis, 731 N.W.2d 539 (Minn. Ct. App. 2007).
In Re the Revocable Trust of Margolis, 731 N.W.2d 539 (Minn. Ct. App. 2007). “Appellant argues that respondent’s use of trust funds to pay for the beneficiary’s medical care was barred by Minn.Stat. § 501B.14 (2006) and that by using trust funds in this way, respondent breached fiduciary duties.”
In Re Margolis Revocable Trust, 765 N.W.2d 919 (Minn. Ct. App. 2009). “[*] On appeal after remand, appellant-trustee challenges the district court's determination that no damages were warranted for respondent-former-trustee's exercise of discretionary powers prohibited by Minn. Stat. § 501B.14 (2008). Appellant also argues that the district court…”
Lorberbaum v. Huff, 765 N.W.2d 919 (Minn. Ct. App. 2009). “* On appeal after remand, appellant-trustee challenges the district court’s determination that no damages were warranted for respondent-former-trustee’s exercise of discretionary powers prohibited by Minn. Stat. § 501B.14 (2008). Appellant also argues that the district court…”
Morrison v. Doyle, 582 N.W.2d 237 (Minn. 1998). “c language at issue has been, since - the time the trust was created, actually mirrored in the legislative scheme that’ governs distribution of trust assets: No trustee may exercise or participate in the exercise of * * * any power of the trustee to make discretionary…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.