Minnesota Statutes
Minn. Stat. § 501B.23 (2026)
[Repealed]
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
MS 2014 [Repealed, 2015 c 5 art 16 s 2]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases, 1999–2016 · leading case: Witzman v. Lehrman, Lehrman & Flom, 601 N.W.2d 179 (Minn. 1999).
Witzman v. Lehrman, Lehrman & Flom, 601 N.W.2d 179 (Minn. 1999). “Indeed, Wolfson’s only facial breach of duty was his alleged failure to provide the probate court with annual accountings for the Residuary Trust and Marital Trust as required by Minn.Stat. § 501B.23. 3 However, even assuming that, as certified accountants, LL & H/Flom should…”
In Re the Trusteeship of Williams, 591 N.W.2d 743 (Minn. Ct. App. 1999). “*746 Under Minn.Stat. § 501B.23 (1998), the Williams trust is subject to the continuing supervision of the district court.”
In Re the Trusteeship of the Trust of Williams, 631 N.W.2d 398 (Minn. Ct. App. 2001). “§ 501B.23 (2000), the Williams trust is subject to the continuing supervision of the district court.”
In Re the Matter of: Anne Ray Charitable Trust, a Minnesota charitable trust, under agreement dated August 20, 1996 & In Re the Matter of: Margaret A. Cargill Found. under agreement dated July 6, 2001. (Minn. Ct. App. 2016). “” The orders did not mention court supervision of either the trusts or appellants; nor did they refer to Minn. Stat. § 501B.23 (2014) (stating that trustees of express trusts are subject to continuing court supervision and are required to file inventories with the court).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.