Minnesota Statutes
Minn. Stat. § 513.08 (2026)
Void When Made To Defraud, Exception
✓ text as last checked Sept. 2026 (this copy records no edition or section history)
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Every conveyance of any estate or interest in lands, or the rents and profits thereof, and every charge upon lands, or upon the rents and profits thereof, made or created with the intent to defraud prior or subsequent purchasers for a valuable consideration of the same lands, rents, or profits, as against any such purchasers, shall be void; but no conveyance or charge shall be deemed fraudulent, in favor of a subsequent purchaser who had actual or constructive notice thereof at the time of purchase, unless it appears that the grantee in such conveyance, or the person to be benefited by such charge, was privy to the intended fraud.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2
cases, 1995–2010 · leading case: Hayes-Broman v. J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., 724 F. Supp. 2d 1003 (D. Minn. 2010).
Hayes-Broman v. J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., 724 F. Supp. 2d 1003 (D. Minn. 2010). “Complaint sought to quiet title; asserted a breach of warranty claim against the McCanns, a slander of title claim against the McCanns, NRV, Vulcan, and C & M, and a negligence claim against Edina Realty; requested that the foreclosure sale be set aside; requested that the…”
Mary Joyce Thomson v. United States, 66 F.3d 160 (8th Cir. 1995). “, Minn.Stat. §§ 513.08, 513.44-.45. Yet a number of cases have held that the § 6321 lien attached to property conveyed by the taxpayer with the intent to defraud creditors, treating the IRS as a defrauded creditor without considering whether that is the proper focus given the…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.