Minn. Stat. » CHAPTER 513. AGREEMENTS RELATING TO PROPERTY
Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 513.25 (2026)

[Repealed]

✓ text as last checked Sept. 2026 (this copy records no edition or section history)
SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

MS 1986 [Repealed, 1987 c 19 s 12]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases, 1979–1999 · leading case: Texas Com. Bank v. Olson, 416 N.W.2d 456 (Minn. Ct. App. 1987).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Texas Com. Bank v. Olson, 416 N.W.2d 456 (Minn. Ct. App. 1987). · cites it 18× “Did the court abuse its discretion in allowing the bank to amend its complaint at the close of the evidence to include a claim under Minn.Stat. § 513.25 (1986)? 3. Did the trial court’s evidentiary rulings substantially prejudice the Olsons’ efforts to defend against the bank’s…”
United States v. Laverne Scherping Loren Scherping Jane Scherping Epsilon Co. C.J.S. Ranch, 187 F.3d 796 (8th Cir. 1999). “Minn.Stat. § 513.25 provided: "Every conveyance made and every obligation incurred without fair consideration when the person making the conveyance or entering into the obligation intends or believes that he [or she] will incur debts beyond his [or her] ability to pay as they…”
State, Dep't of Pub. Welfare v. Thibert, 279 N.W.2d 53 (Minn. 1979). · cites it 3× “23; or (c) the conveyance was without fair consideration and Irene knew or believed that she would incur debts beyond her ability to pay as they matured, § 513.25. (a) The fraudulent intent required under § 513.”
Iannacone v. Foothill Capital Corp. (In re Hancock-Nelson Merchantile Co.), 95 B.R. 982 (Bankr. D. Minn. 1989). “§ 513.25). None of the relevant statutory provisions require Plaintiff to prove that any partid-pant in the two sequences acted with actual intent to defraud Debtor’s other creditors.”
In re Olson, 45 B.R. 501 (Bankr. D. Minn. 1984). “2) conveyances made by a person in business or in a business transaction without fair consideration.”
United States v. Lavern Scherping, No. 98-2009 (8th Cir. Aug. 11, 1999). · cites it 2× “Ranch were fraudulent under Minn. Stat. §§ 513.25 and 513.26. Taxpayers filed an opposition to the government’s motion and their own affidavits.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.