Minnesota Statutes
Minn. Stat. § 513.50 (2026)
Supplementary Provisions
✓ text as last checked Sept. 2026 (this copy records no edition or section history)
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Unless displaced by the provisions of sections 513.41 to 513.51, the principles of law and equity, including the law merchant and the law relating to principal and agent, estoppel, laches, fraud, misrepresentation, duress, coercion, mistake, insolvency, or other validating or invalidating cause, supplement its provisions.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2013–2021 · leading case: In re Petters Co., 494 B.R. 413 (Bankr. D. Minn. 2013).
In re Petters Co., 494 B.R. 413 (Bankr. D. Minn. 2013). “97, § 9 (enacting Minn.Stat. § 513.50). . The project at bar originally implicated nearly 260 adversary proceedings.”
Buckrey v. Comm'r, 114 T.C.M. 45 (T.C. 2017). “" The Commissioner does argue that these principles apply statutorily to MUFTA. He cites Minn. Stat. section 513.”
Elfi E. Janssen v. Lommen, Abdo, Cole, King & Stageberg, P. A., Sibley Holdings, LLC, No. A14-452, 2014 WL 7237121 (Minn. Ct. App. Dec. 22, 2014). “But the MUFTA contains no provision exempting attorneys from liability when they actively participate in a client’s scheme to fraudulently transfer assets in order to frustrate collection of a judgment. To the contrary, the supplementary provisions of the MUFTA emphasize that…”
Ahlgren v. Muller, 555 F. Supp. 3d 688 (D. Minn. 2021). “§ 513.50 , and under agency law, a principal is bound not only by its agent’s actions pursuant to actual authority but also by those for which the principal has apparently delegated authority to the agent, McGee v.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.