Minnesota Statutes
Minn. Stat. § 518.24 (2026)
[Repealed]
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
[Renumbered 518A.71]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 33
cases, 1950–2008 · leading case: Lieder v. Straub, 42 N.W.2d 11 (Minn. 1950).
Lieder v. Straub, 42 N.W.2d 11 (Minn. 1950). “17 confers power on the court in divorce cases to provide in the judgment for the care, custody, and maintenance *464 of the minor children of the parties, § 518.24 provides without restriction or limitation that wilful violation by the husband of the judgment with respect to…”
Marriage of Tell v. Tell, 383 N.W.2d 678 (Minn. 1986). “Wilbern argues that the trial court improperly held him in contempt of court by failing to follow the contempt procedure enunciated in Minn.Stat. § 518.24 (1984). He claims that the statutory provision requires the trial court to first issue an order to pay the support and then,…”
Head v. Metro. Life Ins. Co., 449 N.W.2d 449 (Minn. Ct. App. 1989). “Since Dianne is not prejudiced by Carlton's designation of her as co-beneficiary under the policy with Steele, I would not set aside an otherwise valid insurance contract and impose a constructive trust on Steele's share of the proceeds of the insurance contract. I dissent.…”
Maeder v. Maeder, 480 N.W.2d 677 (Minn. Ct. App. 1992). “24, 1987); Minn.Stat. § 518.24 (1990). Given Phyllis's weak employment prospects, her age, her education, and her vocational experience, we hold that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in ordering life insurance coverage.”
Faus v. Faus, 319 N.W.2d 408 (Minn. 1982). “See Minn.Stat. §§ 518.24, .41-.52, .611, 609.”
Marriage of Katter v. Katter, 457 N.W.2d 750 (Minn. Ct. App. 1990). “Finally, appellant argues that the trial court abused its discretion when it declined to order security for the payment of appellant’s maintenance pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 518.24 (1988). Provision of security pursuant to Minn.”
Marriage of Landwehr v. Landwehr, 380 N.W.2d 136 (Minn. Ct. App. 1985). “Minn.Stat. § 518.24 allows the court to require security “when maintenance or support payments are ordered.”
Marriage of Porter v. Porter, 389 N.W.2d 739 (Minn. Ct. App. 1986). “We hold that the homestead exemption does not prevent a trial court, acting pursuant to its equitable powers outlined in Minn.Stat. §§ 518.24 and 518.64, from applying property divided in a dissolution to satisfaction of a spouse’s judgment based on maintenance arrears.”
In Re Storberg, 94 B.R. 144 (Bankr. D. Minn. 1988). “375 making it a crime, under certain circumstances, to fail to pay child support, Minn.Stat. § 518.24 providing for security and sequestration as a mechanism for enforcing child support orders, and Minn.”
Kerr v. Kerr, 243 N.W.2d 313 (Minn. 1976). “59 shall be final, and subject only to the power of the court to impose a lien or charge thereon at any time while such property, or subsequently acquired property, is owned by the parties or either of them, for the payment of alimony or support money, or to sequester the…”
Marriage of Mahady v. Mahady, 448 N.W.2d 888 (Minn. Ct. App. 1989). “See also Minn.Stat. 518.24 (1988) (failure to obey valid court order to pay spousal maintenance or child support is prima facie evidence of contempt).”
Anderson v. Anderson (In Re Anderson), 62 B.R. 448 (Bankr. D. Minn. 1986). “§ 518.24 (1982); Hurd v. Hurd, 63 Minn. 443 , 65 N.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.