Minn. Stat. » CHAPTER 518C. UNIFORM INTERSTATE FAMILY SUPPORT ACT
Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 518C.02 (2026)

[Repealed]

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

[Repealed, 1994 c 630 art 9 s 4]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases, 1983–1994 · leading case: State Ex Rel. Southwell v. Chamberland, 361 N.W.2d 814 (Minn. 1985).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State Ex Rel. Southwell v. Chamberland, 361 N.W.2d 814 (Minn. 1985). · cites it 2× “The court of appeals based its decision on its interpretation of Minn.Stat. § 518C.02(3) (1982), which defines “duty of support.”
State of Wis. Ex Rel. Southwell v. Chamberland, 349 N.W.2d 309 (Minn. Ct. App. 1984). · cites it 4× “See Minn.Stat. § 518C.02(3) (1982). 1 Only a duty of support, is enforceable under URE-SA.”
England v. England, 337 N.W.2d 681 (Minn. 1983). · cites it 2× “Although the title does specifically mention that the act relates to dissolution, the title also expressly states that the legislation adopts the revised URESA.”
Douglas Cnty. Child Support Enf't Unit v. Cavegn, 420 N.W.2d 244 (Minn. Ct. App. 1988). · cites it 6× “Minn.Stat. § 518C.02, subd. 3 (1982). The applicable law is the law of state "where the obligor was present for the period during which support is sought.”
Cnty. of Nicollet v. Haakenson, 497 N.W.2d 611 (Minn. Ct. App. 1993). · cites it 2× “(emphasis in original); see also Minn. Stat. § 518C.02, subd. 3 (1990) (“ ‘Duty of support’ * * * includes the duty to pay arrearages of support past due and unpaid”); Revised Unif.”
State Ex Rel. Doucette v. Kraskey, 496 N.W.2d 425 (Minn. Ct. App. 1993). · cites it 6× “Minn.Stat. § 518C.02, subds. (5), (13) (1990).”
Country of Poland Ex Rel. Bieniek v. Wegrzyn, 517 N.W.2d 81 (Minn. Ct. App. 1994). · cites it 2× “Minn.Stat. § 518C.02, subd. 14. Thus, a proceeding may be commenced in the appropriate Polish court if Poland has enacted a reciprocal enforcement of support act that is substantially similar to the Minnesota Act.”
— Minn. Stat. § 518C.02(3) — 2 cases
State Ex Rel. Southwell v. Chamberland, 361 N.W.2d 814 (Minn. 1985). “The court of appeals based its decision on its interpretation of Minn.Stat. § 518C.02(3) (1982), which defines “duty of support.”
State of Wis. Ex Rel. Southwell v. Chamberland, 349 N.W.2d 309 (Minn. Ct. App. 1984). “See Minn.Stat. § 518C.02(3) (1982). 1 Only a duty of support, is enforceable under URE-SA.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.