Minn. Stat. » CHAPTER 525. PROBATE PROCEEDINGS
Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 525.532 (2026)

[Repealed]

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

MS 2008 [Repealed, 2009 c 67 s 17]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases, 1973–2000 · leading case: In Re Est. of Abesy, 470 N.W.2d 713 (Minn. Ct. App. 1991).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
In Re Est. of Abesy, 470 N.W.2d 713 (Minn. Ct. App. 1991). · cites it 10× “Did the garnishee summons bar Edwards from disclaiming an interest in the Abesy estate under Minn.Stat. § 525.532, subd. 6 (1990)? ANALYSIS I.”
Dyer v. Eckols, 808 S.W.2d 531 (Tex. App. 1991). · cites it 2× “503 (West 1988); Minn.Stat.Ann. § 525.532(2), (5) (West Supp.”
Essen v. Gilmore, 607 N.W.2d 829 (Neb. 2000). “Minn. Stat. Ann. § 525.532 , subd. 6 (West Cum.”
Oller v. Oller-Chiang, 646 A.2d 822 (Conn. 1994). “” Minn. Stat. Ann. § 525.532 (7). The court held that, “when taken as a whole, the statute’s enumerated factors direct that a guardian be someone who is preferred by the ward if possible .”
Keinath v. Comm'r, 480 F.2d 57 (8th Cir. 1973). · cites it 2× “Also of some relevancy and probative value is the current Minnesota statute, Minn.Stat.Ann. § 525.532 Subd. 3 (1969). 8 While not enacted until 1965, it fixes a reasonable time period at six months after the event that indefeasibly fixes the estate.”
Est. of Radel v. Comm'r, 88 T.C. 1143 (9th Cir. 1987). · cites it 2× “Subdivision 2 provides, in pertinent part, as follows: *1155 A beneficiary may disclaim any interest in whole or in part, or with reference to specific parts, shares or assets thereof, by filing a disclaimer in court in the manner hereinafter provided.”
— Minn. Stat. § 525.532(2) — 1 case
Dyer v. Eckols, 808 S.W.2d 531 (Tex. App. 1991). “503 (West 1988); Minn.Stat.Ann. § 525.532(2), (5) (West Supp.”
— Minn. Stat. § 525.532(6) — 1 case
Dyer v. Eckols, 808 S.W.2d 531 (Tex. App. 1991). “503 (West 1988); Minn.Stat.Ann. § 525.532(2), (5) (West Supp.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.