Minn. Stat. » CHAPTER 525. PROBATE PROCEEDINGS
Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 525.9214 (2026)

[Repealed]

✓ text as last checked Sept. 2026 (this copy records no edition or section history)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

MS 2006 [Repealed, 2007 c 120 art 1 s 26; art 2 s 5]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1994–1998 · leading case: Rahman v. Mayo Clinic, 578 N.W.2d 802 (Minn. Ct. App. 1998).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Rahman v. Mayo Clinic, 578 N.W.2d 802 (Minn. Ct. App. 1998). · cites it 6× “The treating physician informed the decedent’s mother, Marilyn Rahman (Rahman), of his prognosis and that she had a right to make a donation of organs and tissue pursuant to the Uniform Anatomical Gift Act (UAGA), Minn.Stat. § 525.9214(a) (1996). Elizabeth Gayner, an employee of…”
Lyon v. United States, 843 F. Supp. 531 (D. Minn. 1994). · cites it 2× “Minn.Stat. § 525.9214(e). Plaintiffs suggest that failure to comply with the statute demonstrates a lack of good faith on the part of the YA.”
Minn. Stat. § 525.9214(a): 1 case
Rahman v. Mayo Clinic, 578 N.W.2d 802 (Minn. Ct. App. 1998). “The treating physician informed the decedent’s mother, Marilyn Rahman (Rahman), of his prognosis and that she had a right to make a donation of organs and tissue pursuant to the Uniform Anatomical Gift Act (UAGA), Minn.Stat. § 525.9214(a) (1996). Elizabeth Gayner, an employee of…”
Minn. Stat. § 525.9214(e): 1 case
Lyon v. United States, 843 F. Supp. 531 (D. Minn. 1994). “Minn.Stat. § 525.9214(e). Plaintiffs suggest that failure to comply with the statute demonstrates a lack of good faith on the part of the YA.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.