Minn. Stat. » CHAPTER 528. MULTIPARTY ACCOUNTS
Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 528.04 (2026)

[Repealed]

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

MS 1992 [Renumbered 524.6-203]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1984–1986 · leading case: Dufresne v. Am. Nat'l Bank & Trust Co., 374 N.W.2d 763 (Minn. Ct. App. 1985).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Dufresne v. Am. Nat'l Bank & Trust Co., 374 N.W.2d 763 (Minn. Ct. App. 1985). · cites it 4× “See Minn. Stat. §§ 528.04 (c), 528.05(c). *766 At trial the bank contended that the respondent beneficiaries had no legal interest in the funds and thus had no standing to maintain this action.”
Hefner v. Est. of Ingvoldson, 346 N.W.2d 204 (Minn. Ct. App. 1984). · cites it 2× “Minn.Stat. § 528.04(a) (1982). The next section of the chapter continues: Sums remaining on deposit at the death of a party to a joint account belong to the surviving party or parties as against the estate of the decedent unless there is clear and convincing evidence of a…”
Carlson v. Carlson, 363 N.W.2d 803 (Minn. Ct. App. 1985). · cites it 2× “See Minn.Stat. § 528.04(a); Hefner v. Estate of Ingvoldson, 346 N.”
Smith v. State, 389 N.W.2d 543 (Minn. Ct. App. 1986). “Therefore, under § 528.04(a), the entire amount belongs to appellant’s parents unless there is clear and convincing evidence of a different intent.”
— Minn. Stat. § 528.04(a) — 3 cases
Hefner v. Est. of Ingvoldson, 346 N.W.2d 204 (Minn. Ct. App. 1984). “Minn.Stat. § 528.04(a) (1982). The next section of the chapter continues: Sums remaining on deposit at the death of a party to a joint account belong to the surviving party or parties as against the estate of the decedent unless there is clear and convincing evidence of a…”
Carlson v. Carlson, 363 N.W.2d 803 (Minn. Ct. App. 1985). “See Minn.Stat. § 528.04(a); Hefner v. Estate of Ingvoldson, 346 N.”
Smith v. State, 389 N.W.2d 543 (Minn. Ct. App. 1986). “Therefore, under § 528.04(a), the entire amount belongs to appellant’s parents unless there is clear and convincing evidence of a different intent.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.