Minnesota Statutes
Minn. Stat. § 540.16 (2026)
[Repealed]
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
MS 1949 [Repealed, 1974 c 394 s 12]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9
cases, 1944–1982 · leading case: Chapman v. Dorsey, 16 A.L.R. 2d 1015 (Minn. 1950).
Chapman v. Dorsey, 16 A.L.R. 2d 1015 (Minn. 1950). “Plaintiff’s motion to dismiss the appeal and quash the writ presents the following issues: (1) Is an order denying a motion — made pursuant to § 540.16, as amended by L. 1947, c. 152 — to bring in additional parties defendant appealable? (2) If such order is not appealable, may…”
Chapman v. Dorsey, 230 Minn. 279 (Minn. 1950). “Plaintiff's motion to dismiss the appeal and quash the writ presents the following issues: (1) Is an order denying a motion made pursuant to § 540.16, as amended by L. 1947, c. 152 to bring in additional parties defendant appealable? (2) If such order is not appealable, may…”
Koenigs v. Travis, 75 N.W.2d 478 (Minn. 1956). “1949, § 540.16, by amendment, L. 1947,1 c. 152.”
Gustafson v. Johnson, 51 N.W.2d 108 (Minn. 1952). “The same is true under the third-party practice in many other jurisdictions. 39 Am. Jur., Parties, § 85. While the Wisconsin third-party statute, as well as that oí some of the other states and the federal rules of civil procedure, is more specific than ours, the main purpose of…”
In Re Objections & Defenses, Etc., 320 N.W.2d 729 (Minn. 1982). “NOTES [1] Minn.Stat. § 540.16 (1949), repealed in 1974, has been replaced by Minn.”
Cranak v. Link, 17 N.W.2d 359 (Minn. 1944). “Section 540.16, subd. 1 (§ 9181), sets forth the method of bringing in additional parties who are necessary for the full determination of an action.”
Vill. Apts. v. State, 320 N.W.2d 729 (Minn. 1982). “Minn.Stat. § 540.16 (1949), repealed in 1974, has been replaced by Minn.”
Luethi v. Stanko, 61 N.W.2d 522 (Minn. 1953). “[2d] 442) : “Upon principle, we must reaffirm as sound and as applicable to § 540.16, as amended by L. 1947, c. 152, the rule of McClearn v.”
Conradson v. Vinkemeier, 51 N.W.2d 651 (Minn. 1952). “At best, it would be discretionary with the trial court to determine whether the additional party brought in under § 540.16 should remain in the case. We find no abuse of discretion in granting plaintiffs’ motion to dismiss as to such defendant.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.