Minnesota Statutes
Minn. Stat. § 549.23 (2026)
[Repealed]
✓ text as last checked Sept. 2026 (this copy records no edition or section history)
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
MS 1988 [Repealed, 1990 c 555 s 23]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases, 1987–1990 · leading case: Schweich v. Ziegler, Inc., 463 N.W.2d 722 (Minn. 1990).
Schweich v. Ziegler, Inc., 463 N.W.2d 722 (Minn. 1990). “On appeal are issues regarding (a) the demand for a jury trial, (b) sufficiency of the evidence, (c) "newly discovered" evidence of the injured plaintiff's physical abilities, (d) constitutionality of Minn.Stat. § 549.23 (1988), and (e) the allocation of the tort recovery award…”
Kociemba v. G.D. Searle & Co., 707 F. Supp. 1517 (D. Minn. 1989). “The Court subsequently reduced the $1,000,-000 award for emotional distress to $400,000 pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 549.23, which limits recovery for intangible loss to $400,000.”
Rowe v. St. Paul Ramsey Med. Ctr., 460 N.W.2d 98 (Minn. Ct. App. 1990). “The “undefined elements” aspect of consortium was affirmed by the legislature in the Tort Reform Act of 1986: Minn.Stat. § 549.23, subd. 1, includes “loss of consortium” in the definition of “intangible loss.”
Carnahan v. Walsh, 416 N.W.2d 187 (Minn. Ct. App. 1987). “§ 549.23, subd. 1. Carnahan claims the special verdict confused the jury.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.