Minn. Stat. » CHAPTER 554. FREE SPEECH; PARTICIPATION IN GOVERNMENT
Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 554.01 (2026)

[Repealed]

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

MS 2022 [Repealed, 2024 c 123 art 18 s 16]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 21 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1997–2026 · leading case: Middle-Snake-Tamarac Rivers Watershed Dist. v. Stengrim, 784 N.W.2d 834 (Minn. 2010).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Middle-Snake-Tamarac Rivers Watershed Dist. v. Stengrim, 784 N.W.2d 834 (Minn. 2010). · cites it 12× “” Minn.Stat. § 554.01, subd. 3. A “ ‘[m]otion’ includes any motion to dismiss, motion for summary judgment, or any other judicial pleading filed to dispose of a judicial claim.”
Leiendecker v. Asian Women United of Minnesota, 895 N.W.2d 623 (Minn. 2017). · cites it 4× “Minn. Stat. §§ 554.01 -.06 (2016). After we clarified the law’s procedure, the district court ruled that the section of the law that governs motions “to dispose of a judicial claim,” Minn.”
Nexus v. Swift, 785 N.W.2d 771 (Minn. Ct. App. 2010). · cites it 4× “1, which is defined as “speech or lawful conduct that is genuinely aimed in whole or in part at procuring favorable government action,” Minn.Stat. § 554.01, subd. 6. The district court must suspend discovery pending the final disposition of the motion to dismiss, but it may…”
Marchant Inv. & Mgmt. Co. v. St. Anthony West Neighborhood Org., Inc., 694 N.W.2d 92 (Minn. Ct. App. 2005). · cites it 4× “In litigation between a real-estate developer and a neighborhood organization, the district court applied the participation-in-government immunity provided by Minn. Stat. §§ 554.01 -.05 (2004) to grant judgment on the pleadings for the neighborhood organization.”
Freeman v. Swift, 776 N.W.2d 485 (Minn. Ct. App. 2009). · cites it 5× “” Minn.Stat. § 554.01, subd. 6 (2008). The statute protects public participation by providing immunity from liability for “¡Tjawful conduct or speech that is genuinely aimed in whole or in part at procuring favorable government action .”
Unity Healthcare, Inc. v. Cnty. of Hennepin, 308 F.R.D. 537 (D. Minnesota 2015). · cites it 4× “” Minn.Stat. § 554.01, subd. 2. *555 1. The plaintiffs are not relitigating the threshold issue As an initial matter, Meridian and Stewart assert that the plaintiffs are merely trying to get this Court to reconsider the determination that the District Court made regarding the…”
Warren Whisenhunt v. Matthew Lippincott & Creg Parks, 416 S.W.3d 689 (Tex. App. 2013). “231, § 59H; Minn.Stat. § 554.01; Neb.Rev.Stat. § 25-21,241; N.”
Leiendecker v. Asian Women United of Minnesota, 834 N.W.2d 741 (Minn. Ct. App. 2013). · cites it 2× “” Minn.Stat. § 554.01, subd. 6. The district court must grant a motion to dismiss under the anti-SLAPP statute unless the responding party produces “clear and convincing evidence that the acts of the moving party are not immunized from liability” because the moving party’s…”
Donovan v. Gardner, 740 N.E.2d 639 (Mass. App. Ct. 2000). “14, § 556 [1995]); Minnesota ( Minn. Stat. Ann. §§ 554.01 — 554.05 [West 1994]); Nebraska ( Neb.”
Mobile Diagnostic Imaging, Inc. v. Racheal L. Hooten f/k/a Racheal L. Jones, 889 N.W.2d 27 (Minn. Ct. App. 2016). · cites it 2× “OPINION STAUBER, Judge Appellant challenges the district court’s order dismissing its claims as barred by the anti-SLAPP statute, Minn. Stat. §§ 554.01 -.05 (2014), and Minn.”
Duracraft Corp. v. Holmes Prods. Corp., 678 N.E.2d 1196 (Mass. App. Ct. 1997). “” Minn. Stat. Ann. § 554.01 (West Supp. 1997).”
Perry v. Perez-Wendt, 294 P.3d 1081 (Haw. App. 2013). “" Minn.Stat. Ann. §§ 554.01 (West, Westlaw through 1994 Act 566).”
Show all 21 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.