Minnesota Statutes
Minn. Stat. § 572B.22 (2026)
Confirmation Of Award
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
After a party to the arbitration proceeding receives notice of an award, the party may file a motion with the court for an order confirming the award, at which time the court shall issue such an order unless the award is modified or corrected pursuant to section 572B.20 or 572B.24 or is vacated pursuant to section 572B.23.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 10
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2014–2023 · leading case: Mark Herll v. Auto-Owners Ins. Co., 879 F.3d 293 (8th Cir. 2018).
Mark Herll v. Auto-Owners Ins. Co., 879 F.3d 293 (8th Cir. 2018). “See Minn. Stat. § 572B.22. Auto-Owners also moved for summary judgment, asserting that it had fulfilled its duties under the contract by paying the amount owed under the appraisal award for the first item only.”
Trout Brook South Condo. Ass'n v. Harleysville Worcester Ins., 995 F. Supp. 2d 1035 (D. Minnesota 2014). “at 12-15.) It further argues that absent a timely motion to modify or vacate, the Court “must” confirm the appraisal award.”
James Poehler v. Cincinnati Ins. Co., 874 N.W.2d 806 (Minn. Ct. App. 2016). “1 Four months later, Poehler filed an action in district court seeking, among other things, confirmation of the appraisal award the Uniform Arbitration Act, see Minn. Stat. § 572B.22 (2014), and preaward interest under the prejudgment interest statute.”
Savanna Grove Coach Homeowners' Ass'n v. Auto-Owners Ins. Co. (D. Minnesota 2020). “22 provides: “After a party to the arbitration proceeding receives notice of an award, the party may file a motion with the court for an order confirming the award, at which time the court shall issue such an order unless the award is modified or corrected pursuant to section…”
Rocon, Inc. v. EDR Ltd. (Minn. Ct. App. 2016). “” Minn. Stat. § 572B.22. A party to an arbitration award may move to vacate the award on any of six specified grounds.”
Herll v. Auto Owners Ins. Co. (D. Minnesota 2018). “” Minn. Stat. § 572B.22. Defendant argues there is no reason for the Court to issue an order confirming the award, as it has already been paid.”
Clover Leaf Farm Condo. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co. (D. Minnesota 2019). “) Clover Leaf also seeks declaratory judgment: (1) confirming the Award pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 572B.22 and declaring that it covers only the cost of siding (“Count II”); and (2) awarding pre-award interest on the Award under Minn.”
Savanna Grove Coach Homeowners' Ass'n v. Auto-Owners Ins. Co. (D. Minnesota 2020). “” Minn. Stat. § 572B.22. “Upon granting an order confirming .”
Fenske v. Integrity Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co. (D. Minnesota 2023). “” Minn. Stat. § 572B.22. However, Minnesota Supreme Court, Eighth Circuit, and U.”
Bemidji Twp. v. City of Bemidji, N. Twp. (Minn. Ct. App. 2015). “See Minn. Stat. § 572B.22 (2014). The Township made no motion to modify, correct, or vacate the award within the statutory time limits.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.