Minnesota Statutes
Minn. Stat. § 581.01 (2026)
Rules Governing
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Actions for the foreclosure of mortgages shall be governed by the same rules and provisions of statute as civil actions, except as in this chapter otherwise provided.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1988–2026 · leading case: JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. Erlandson, 821 N.W.2d 600 (Minn. Ct. App. 2012).
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. Erlandson, 821 N.W.2d 600 (Minn. Ct. App. 2012). “See Minn.Stat. § 581.01 (2010) (stating that, unless displaced by provisions of chapter 581, the rules of civil procedure apply to “[ajctions for the foreclosure of mortgages”).”
Resolution Trust Corp. v. Flanagan, 821 F. Supp. 572 (D. Minnesota 1993). “The RTC now contends that summary judgment on its claim against Flanagan is appropriate and seeks an order adjudging the amounts currently owed pursuant to the terms of the loan documents and authorizing a foreclosure sale of the land pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 581.01 et seq.…”
Zetah v. Isaacs, 428 N.W.2d 96 (Minn. Ct. App. 1988). “Minn.Stat. § 581.01 (1986). Finally, Minn.”
The Bank of New York Mellon fka The Bank of New York, as Tr. for the certificate holders of Cwalt, Inc. Alt. ... (Minn. Ct. App. 2026). “To persuade us otherwise, Auld makes three arguments.”
United States v. Weldon B. Nelson Grace M. Nelson, 101 F.3d 1284 (8th Cir. 1996). “01 (1992), and the other is by judicial action, pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 581.01 (1992). Minnesota’s statutes clearly define these two methods of foreclosure, and they provide for no other method of foreclosure.”
United States v. Weldon B. Nelson (8th Cir. 1996). “01 (1992), and the other is by judicial action, pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 581.01 (1992). Minnesota's statutes clearly define these two methods of foreclosure, and they provide for no other method of foreclosure.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.