Minn. Stat. » CHAPTER 581. MORTGAGES; FORECLOSURE BY ACTION
Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 581.09 (2026)

Satisfaction Of Judgment

✓ text as last checked Sept. 2026 (this copy records no edition or section history)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Upon confirmation of the report of sale, the court administrator shall enter satisfaction of the judgment to the extent of the sum bid for the premises, less expenses and costs. The amount entered is full satisfaction of the judgment unless a deficiency is allowed under section 582.30. If a deficiency judgment is allowed under section 582.30, the balance of the judgment remaining unpaid may be executed and satisfied in the same manner as a personal judgment against the mortgagor.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8 cases, 1944–2014 · leading case: JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. Erlandson, 821 N.W.2d 600 (Minn. Ct. App. 2012).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. Erlandson, 821 N.W.2d 600 (Minn. Ct. App. 2012). · cites it 4× “” Minn.Stat. § 581.09 (2010); see Minn.Stat.”
Gate City Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass'n v. O'Connor, 410 N.W.2d 448 (Minn. Ct. App. 1987). · cites it 2× “64 plus interest upon which a deficiency judgment would be entered pursuant to Minn.Stat. §§ 581.09, 582.30 (1986). The O’Connors now appeal, arguing that North Dakota law should apply to the deficiency, not Minnesota law.”
Geneva JPM 2003-pm1, LLC v. Geneva FSCX I, LLC, 843 N.W.2d 263 (Minn. Ct. App. 2014). · cites it 4× “See Minn.Stat. § 581.09 (2012) (requiring entry of satisfaction of the foreclosure judgment to the extent of the bid for the premises less expenses and costs); Black’s Law Dictionary 487 (9th ed.”
Kooda Bros. Constr. v. United Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass'n of Alexandria, 400 N.W.2d 407 (Minn. Ct. App. 1987). · cites it 2× “See Minn.Stat. § 581.09 (1986). DECISION The trial court did not err in determining that respondent was entitled to indemnity against the mechanic’s liens.”
Norwest Bank Hastings Nat'l Ass'n v. Franzmeier, 355 N.W.2d 431 (Minn. Ct. App. 1984). · cites it 2× “Further, Minn.Stat. § 581.09, immediately preceding the redemption provision of § 581.”
Am. Nat'l Bank of Minnesota v. Hous. & Redevelopment Auth. for Brainerd, 773 N.W.2d 333 (Minn. Ct. App. 2009). · cites it 2× “” Minn. Stat. § 581.09 (2008). Minn.Stat. § 582.”
In re Landmark, 48 B.R. 626 (Bankr. D. Minn. 1985). “§ 581.09. The mere commencement of a judicial foreclosure would violate the permanent injunction under 11 U.”
Olmsted Cnty. Bank & Trust Co. v. Pesch, 16 N.W.2d 470 (Minn. 1944). “A question as to the disallowance of the intervening bondholders’ attorneys’ fees is also raised.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.