Minn. Stat. » CHAPTER 6. STATE AUDITOR
Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 6.01 (2026)

Duties, Seal

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

The state auditor shall superintend and manage the fiscal concerns of the state as required by law. The state auditor may execute in behalf of the state assignments and satisfactions of judgments rendered in its favor. The state auditor shall have a seal bearing the words "Seal of the Auditor of Minnesota" and affix it to all official certificates and conveyances executed by the state auditor.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 18 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1973–2025 · leading case: State v. Burbach, 706 N.W.2d 484 (Minn. 2005).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Burbach, 706 N.W.2d 484 (Minn. 2005). “§ 6.01, may not be tire basis for a search incident to probable cause to arrest.”
In re Petters Co., 506 B.R. 784 (Bankr. D. Minn. 2013). · cites it 2× “” Security Agreement with DZ Bank, § 6.01(b), PCF-003.0074. But even with that duty assignment, DZ Bank had the right under the Security Agreement to “contact any or all Opportunity Loan Borrowers [i.”
State, Off. of the State Auditor v. Minnesota Ass'n of Prof'l Employees, 504 N.W.2d 751 (Minn. 1993). · cites it 2× “XI, § 13 (officers charged with the safekeeping of state funds are required to give ample security for them and to keep accurate entries of each sum received); Minn.Stat. § 6.01 (1992) (specifying the duties of a state auditor); Minn.”
Thomas B. Olson & Assocs., P.A. v. Leffert, Jay & Polglaze, P.A., 756 N.W.2d 907 (Minn. Ct. App. 2008). “, § 6.01, cmt. d. (2006). This section of the Restatement has not been adopted in Minnesota.”
Fair Isaac Corp. v. Experian Info. Solutions Inc., 645 F. Supp. 2d 734 (D. Minnesota 2009). “Classic Agreement §§ 6.01, 6.02, 6.04, 6.05. Trans Union asserts that Fair Isaac has not alleged a breach of any of these expressly identified contractual duties.”
State Ex Rel. Spannaus v. Hopf, 323 N.W.2d 746 (Minn. 1982). “Anderson, 1 American Law of Zoning, § 6.01 at 354 (1976). We have recognized that such “nonconforming uses must either be permitted to remain or be eliminated by use of eminent domain.”
Anderson v. Federated Mut. Ins. Co., 465 N.W.2d 68 (Minn. Ct. App. 1991). · cites it 2× “" Domke on Commercial *70 Arbitration § 6.01, at 73 (G. Wilner rev. ed.1984) [hereinafter Domke].”
Enright v. City of Bloomington, 203 N.W.2d 396 (Minn. 1973). · cites it 2× “'" 1 Anderson, American Law of Zoning, § 6.01. [2] The city planning commission is an advisory commission composed of a cross-section of the citizens of the community.”
OmegaGenesis Corp. v. Mayo Found. for Med. Educ. & Rsch., 132 F. Supp. 3d 1119 (D. Minnesota 2015). “§ 6.01. Pursuant to the License Agreement, Mayo did not receive any upfront monetary consideration from OmegaGenesis.”
Otto v. Wright Cnty., 910 N.W.2d 446 (Minn. 2018). · cites it 6× “The State Auditor "superintend[s] and manage[s] the fiscal concerns of the state," Minn. Stat. § 6.01 (2016). Since Minnesota's territorial days, this responsibility has encompassed some oversight of county finances.”
Est. of Hadaway, 668 N.W.2d 920 (Minn. Ct. App. 2003). “Stein, Stein on Probate, § 6.01(c) (3d ed.1995). Stein indicates that most contract claims against the estate arise before death, leaving the claims that arise after death as mostly administrative charges incurred by the personal representative.”
Black v. Stumvoll, 374 N.W.2d 782 (Minn. Ct. App. 1985). “Digest, Negligence § 6.01 (pp. 292-30) (3d ed. 1981). Perhaps the most commonly used definition is contained in the jury instruction guide which has been approved by the Minnesota Supreme Court.”
Show all 18 citing cases →
— Minn. Stat. § 6.01(b) — 1 case
In re Petters Co., 506 B.R. 784 (Bankr. D. Minn. 2013). “” Security Agreement with DZ Bank, § 6.01(b), PCF-003.0074. But even with that duty assignment, DZ Bank had the right under the Security Agreement to “contact any or all Opportunity Loan Borrowers [i.”
— Minn. Stat. § 6.01(c) — 1 case
Est. of Hadaway, 668 N.W.2d 920 (Minn. Ct. App. 2003). “Stein, Stein on Probate, § 6.01(c) (3d ed.1995). Stein indicates that most contract claims against the estate arise before death, leaving the claims that arise after death as mostly administrative charges incurred by the personal representative.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.