Minn. Stat. » CHAPTER 606. WRIT OF CERTIORARI
Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 606.04 (2026)

Costs

✓ text as last checked Sept. 2026 (this copy records no edition or section history)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

The party prevailing on a writ of certiorari in any proceeding of a civil nature shall be entitled to costs against the adverse party. If the writ appears to have been brought for the purpose of delay or vexation, the court of appeals may award double costs to the prevailing party.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1984–2016 · leading case: Cnty. of Washington v. City of Oak Park Heights, 818 N.W.2d 533 (Minn. 2012).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Cnty. of Washington v. City of Oak Park Heights, 818 N.W.2d 533 (Minn. 2012). · cites it 2× “The party shall apply to the Court of Appeals for the writ. Minn.Stat.”
Blanding v. Sports & Health Club, Inc., 373 N.W.2d 784 (Minn. Ct. App. 1985). · cites it 28× “60 (Jurisdiction, Court of Appeals) The argument has also been advanced that Minn.Stat. § 606.04 (Supp.1983) confers jurisdiction on this court in addition to the jurisdiction provided in § 480A.”
In re the Placement on Unrequested Leave of Absence of Pinkney, 353 N.W.2d 676 (Minn. Ct. App. 1984). · cites it 2× “See Minn. Stat. § 606.04 (Supp.1983). 5. The “30 days from mailing” limitation of Rule 115.”
In the Matter of the SIRS Appeal of Gary L. Johnson & In the Matter of the SIRS Appeal of Joshawa J. Johnson., No. A15-1944 (Minn. Ct. App. Nov. 7, 2016). · cites it 2× “Minn. Stat. § 606.04 (2014). Because relators have not met their burden in challenging DHS’s suspensions, they are not entitled to costs.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.