Minnesota Statutes
Minn. Stat. § 609.291 (2026)
[Repealed]
✓ text as last checked Sept. 2026 (this copy records no edition or section history)
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
[Repealed, 1975 c 374 s 13]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 15
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1972–2024 · leading case: State v. Witt, 245 N.W.2d 612 (Minn. 1976).
State v. Witt, 245 N.W.2d 612 (Minn. 1976). “1974, *214 § 609.291, 1 our former aggravated rape statute, on the ground that it singles out for prosecution males who engage in illegal sexual intercourse with females — a particular type of sexual penetration — and subjects them to a maximum 30-year sentence, whereas males or…”
State v. Willis, 269 N.W.2d 355 (Minn. 1978). “1974, § 609.291(2)]. He was thereafter sentenced to serve concurrent terms on the two criminal charges to be served consecutively with prior sentences on burglary and receiving stolen property, for which probation was revoked.”
State v. Beier, 263 N.W.2d 622 (Minn. 1978). “1974, § 609.291, and was sentenced by the trial court to a maximum indeterminate term of 30 years in prison.”
Schultz v. State, 290 N.W.2d 778 (Minn. 1980). “Petitioner was convicted by a district court jury in -1976 of aggravated rape and indecent liberties, Minn.Stat. §§ 609.291(2) and 609.-296, subd.”
State v. Hill, 244 N.W.2d 728 (Minn. 1976). “1974, § 609.291, under which defendant was charged, was repealed on June 5,1975, by L.”
State v. Schultz, 262 N.W.2d 411 (Minn. 1978). “1974, § 609.291(2), and indecent liberties, Minn.”
State of Minnesota v. Sylvester Jones, 7 N.W.3d 391 (Minn. 2024). “See Minn. Stat. § 609.291 (1974) (defining “aggravated rape” as “sexual intercourse .”
State v. Holty, 238 N.W.2d 615 (Minn. 1976). “1974, § 609.291(1), and sentenced by the trial court to a maximum indeterminate term of 15 years’ imprisonment.”
State v. Thomas, 232 N.W.2d 766 (Minn. 1975). “1974, § 609.291(2), and sentenced by the trial court to the custody of the Youth Conservation Commission.”
State v. Saldana, 246 N.W.2d 37 (Minn. 1976). “1974, § 609.291(2). Defendant principally contends that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel, was prejudiced by the absence of an interpreter at the preliminary hearing, and was entitled under the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United…”
State v. Boykin, 252 N.W.2d 604 (Minn. 1977). “Defendant was also charged with aggravated rape, § 609.291, but the jury acquitted him of that charge.”
Bettin v. State, 396 N.W.2d 249 (Minn. Ct. App. 1986). “He was convicted in 1974 under Minn.Stat. § 609.291 (1971) for the aggravated rape of an 83 year old woman, a neighbor of his parents.”
Minn. Stat. § 609.291(1): 2 cases
State v. Holty, 238 N.W.2d 615 (Minn. 1976). “1974, § 609.291(1), and sentenced by the trial court to a maximum indeterminate term of 15 years’ imprisonment.”
State v. Holly, 260 N.W.2d 293 (Minn. 1977).
Minn. Stat. § 609.291(2): 5 cases
State v. Willis, 269 N.W.2d 355 (Minn. 1978). “1974, § 609.291(2)]. He was thereafter sentenced to serve concurrent terms on the two criminal charges to be served consecutively with prior sentences on burglary and receiving stolen property, for which probation was revoked.”
Schultz v. State, 290 N.W.2d 778 (Minn. 1980). “Petitioner was convicted by a district court jury in -1976 of aggravated rape and indecent liberties, Minn.Stat. §§ 609.291(2) and 609.-296, subd.”
State v. Schultz, 262 N.W.2d 411 (Minn. 1978). “1974, § 609.291(2), and indecent liberties, Minn.”
State v. Thomas, 232 N.W.2d 766 (Minn. 1975). “1974, § 609.291(2), and sentenced by the trial court to the custody of the Youth Conservation Commission.”
State v. Saldana, 246 N.W.2d 37 (Minn. 1976). “1974, § 609.291(2). Defendant principally contends that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel, was prejudiced by the absence of an interpreter at the preliminary hearing, and was entitled under the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.