Minn. Stat. » CHAPTER 61. LIFE INSURANCE
Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 61.24 (2026)

[Repealed]

✓ text as last checked Sept. 2026 (this copy records no edition or section history)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

[Repealed, 1967 c 395 art 2 s 53]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1949–1965 · leading case: Roeder v. North Am. Life Ins., 106 N.W.2d 624 (Minn. 1960).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Roeder v. North Am. Life Ins., 106 N.W.2d 624 (Minn. 1960). · cites it 10× “de by the insured in his application willfully false and intentionally misleading as a matter of law? (3) Must the provisions in the application and in the policy requiring the insured to be in sound health on the date of his application and on the date of issuance and delivery…”
Pomerenke v. Farmers Life Ins. Co., 36 N.W.2d 703 (Minn. 1949). · cites it 3× “03, on the theory that he was one of defendant’s “managing agents”; (2) whether a nonmedical standard life insurance policy is subject to the provisions of § 61.24; and (3) whether plaintiff beneficiary is barred by the act of the insured in signing the application without…”
Larson v. Union Cent. Life Ins. Co., 137 N.W.2d 327 (Minn. 1965). · cites it 6× “Plaintiff’s argument is that § 61.24 should be construed the same as § 61.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.